Archived Story

Mayor race shows strengths, weaknesses

Published 12:00am Sunday, November 6, 2011

What a difference four years can make when it comes to the City of Ironton’s mayoral race.

In the 2007 election, seasoned politician Bob Cleary pitted his track record and six years experience as mayor and many more as a councilman against relative newcomer Rich Blankenship, who built his campaign on the need for change. Bob Vaughn, Walt Butler and Leonard Battise were three dark horse candidates.

Fast forward to 2011 and you will see a sort of reverse symmetry. Blankenship has built his campaign on his past four years as mayor and the progress he believes the city has made. Cleary is the candidate pushing hard that now is time for a change. Former councilman and city employee Karl Wentz is the wild card this time around.

All three men have legitimate ideas that could help the city move forward. If all could be combined into one leader, the city of Ironton would have the best mayor in the State of Ohio.

Unfortunately, that simply isn’t possible.

Although the difference between the two primary candidates has narrowed from two years ago, The Tribune Editorial Board believes Rich Blankenship has earned the right to serve the citizens of Ironton for another four years.

He has shown a willingness to work hard for the city and its residents, approaching every issue with genuine passion and positive attitude.

His efforts to keep the Ironton-Russell Bridge replacement on track should not be overlooked. Although critics will say that Blankenship simply did what any mayor would do, we disagree.

He went above and beyond the call of duty, did his homework and approached the issue professionally and with facts. Because of his efforts, the bridge is still relatively on track and southern Ohio avoided being an experiment on a new funding approach.

Blankenship has done a tremendous job seeking grant funding and investing in improving the city’s assets. This is evident in the infrastructure improvements perhaps more than anywhere else.

Although less tangible, one of the things Blankenship has in his favor is the sense of positive momentum and the fact that the city is no longer stagnant, as it had been for years. This is reflected across the city by many people who have seen the sense of pride and optimism wane over the past decade or two.

Overall, the city has moved forward in the past four years under Blankenship’s guidance. Many of the issues he has addressed had been neglected for years.

However, this progress hasn’t come without a significant price tag. The city’s debt and operating expenses have grown at a concerning rate, especially its salaries. This is an area the mayor — and the council — must make a priority immediately.

The city has had the luxury of a sizeable carryover to help mask this problem of spending more than it generates, but that is about to go away. Blankenship needs to look at every facet of how the city operates to keep spending down. One area will almost certainly be salaries and benefits as these have continued to skyrocket.

It is also time to be creative with revenue and look at who pays what and where the money goes. Most important may be the need to find ways to ensure all citizens are pulling their weight.

Bob Cleary, who still has two years on council, needs to be a partner in moving the city forward. The man may have a better handle on the financial challenges facing the city than any of his opponents. He has some legitimate ideas that he should work with the mayor on for the betterment of the city.

His proposals to invest in economic development by constructing a spec building at the industrial park and looking at every fee on the city’s utility bills are valid.

These men need to put their politics and idealogical differences aside.

Cleary would be the most experienced council member and should help lead that body to work with the mayor to achieve his vision. That will help the city and also be the best campaign material for Cleary four years from now.

Karl Wentz has some valid ideas and a firm understanding of many of the city’s individual departments. He has worked in just about all of them.

His emphasis on creating a long-term plan for the city’s growth is something that has to happen, regardless of who wins.

Both Wentz and Cleary believe that re-establishing an engineering department would save the city money and give it better oversight and control of projects, rather than contracting everything out.

This is something Blankenship should look at immediately by having an independent consultant look over the projects in recent years to determine if this makes financial sense.

All three men have strengths and weaknesses. No one is perfect.

Rich Blankenship has done his part to lead the city toward a bright future. He deserves the chance to keep guiding the way for four more years.


Michael Caldwell is publisher of The Tribune. To reach him, call (740) 532-1445 ext. 24 or by e-mail at


The Tribune believes it is possible for people with a variety of points of view to discuss issues in a civil manner and will remove comments that, in our opinion, foster incivility. We want to encourage an open exchange of information and ideas. Responsibility for what is posted or contributed to this site is the sole responsibility of each user. By contributing to this website, you agree not to post any defamatory, abusive, harassing, obscene, sexual, threatening or illegal material, or any other material that infringes on the ability of others to enjoy this site, or that infringes on the rights of others. Any user who feels that a contribution to this website is a violation of these terms of use is encouraged to email, or click the "report comment" link that is on all comments. We reserve the right to remove messages that violate these terms of use and we will make every effort to do so — within a reasonable time frame — if we determine that removal is necessary.

  • Cashmere

    Since Mr. Cleary is rejecting Issue 2,which would give mayors the ability to scale back the cost of benefits to the city, and he wants to remove fees from the water bill, it will be interesting to see how he will generate needed revenue and cut spending to lessen the city’s debt. Though on the flyer left on my door, he quotes the Bible verse about being kind to strangers, you may be entertaining angels unaware, so maybe he is bringing in divine assistance, which I wouldn’t argue with.

    (Report comment)

  • Poor Richard

    Bob Cleary just needs to go away.

    I am very impressed with Rich Blankenship. His leadership abilities are top notch and if re-elected his skills and experience as mayor will continue to grow and expand which would only help Ironton, not hinder it. He appears to be a straight forward guy with Ironton’s best interest in mind.

    Each time Ironton citizens elect a candidate with no experience as mayor then they get someone with a large learning curve and many mistakes can be made. Chances are if someone was not a good mayor in the past, they likely they won’t be a good mayor in the future. Ironton has some good things going their way, stay with Blankenship, keep his experience and let him grow with Ironton.

    (Report comment)

Editor's Picks

Local hip-hop artist to perform at SXSW

Ironton High School Class of 2011 graduate McKinley Carter, who goes by the name of Mac Carter, knew at a young age he wanted to ... Read more