Memorial Hall might get new owners
Published 9:38am Thursday, January 19, 2012An aging Ironton landmark threatened with an uncertain future could get a new owner and a new use as the county commission considers taking over the historic Memorial Hall.
Recently, Mayor Rich Blankenship approached the commissioners about the possibility of the city transferring ownership of the building to the county.
The structure, built in 1892 as a memorial to the Grand Army of the Republic, once housed Ironton’s city hall and city jail before it was abandoned.
Right now the city of Ironton owns the more than 100-year-old building that community groups, including the American Legion Post 433, a few years ago campaigned to rescue. However, after about a couple of years of fundraising attempts, the legion gave up its efforts.
“We are in the preliminary stages of planning,” Commission President Les Boggs said. “The taxpayers’ money, we believe, must be spent wisely and efficiently, looking at all options for the Memorial building.”
Restoring the structure came under fire this past June when E.L. Robinson, the city’s engineering consultant, recommended that it be torn down because the firm estimated the cost of restoration at almost $8 million. To raze it would be about a quarter of a million dollars, the firm said.
“It is our recommendation that the city demolish the building, so that further deterioration does not add to the risk of the building collapsing on the city streets and possibly causing a very serious accident or fatality,” the report said.
Among the problems cited in the report were crevices around the building’s masonry that could allow water to get into the interior and exterior masonry walls. That could potentially freeze and cause structural damage. There was also water damage inside the building.
Possible restoration by the county would be contingent on getting outside funding, Boggs said.
“We cannot conclude with any specificity any final decision until we see what tax credits we can receive from the state and federal governments,” he said.
Boggs also said he did not know if the mayor would have to bring the matter before Ironton City Council for its approval before any ownership transfer could occur.
A possible use for the building would be to house a consolidation of the county’s emergency operations, including the 911 dispatchers, the emergency medical service and emergency management agency administrative offices and a newly established office for the county coroner.
“We know it would be nice to have those into one building because the current buildings are decaying,” Boggs said. “We also know from our studies from the square footage, it would cost a lot of money. But if we are able to get some help, we may be able to restore it at a significantly lower cost than to build a new building. Maybe even a million and a half less than what would be anticipated to build a new one.”
The county applied in 2011 for a $1 million Homeland Security grant with the intent of building an emergency operations center. However, there were only 14 of those grants given out across the country and the county did not get approval.
But there are other sources of funding that could put new life into Memorial Hall, including Community Development Block Grant money and a smaller Homeland Security grant, Commissioner Bill Pratt said.
“We are trying to get historical money through the preservation of the building and that would mean 35 cents on the dollar,” Pratt said. “If it cost $3.1 million, we would get about $1.1 million. I think the Memorial Hall should be preserved because it has a significance in Ironton.”
According to Shawn Walker, the architect the county called in as a consultant, there is about a two-year window where restoration is possible, the commissioner said.
“The mortar that holds the block and sandstone together, the longer that sits there without being restored, the less chance we have to save it,” Pratt said.






I am all for preservation, however, the building is too far gone to be viable. Memorial Hall does not have the technology to be a 9-1-1 center (remember, that is why the HS was torn down as it could not be brought up to tech needs for the HS students…) Some of the empty stores in town could be transformed into the 9-1-1 center should there be funds for that in the future. Tear Memorial Hall down, use the stone to build something useful, meaningful… and follow the architecture design of Memorial Hall (arches)and use the stone to build the pillars and walls for an outdoor covered pavillion that could be used for small concerts, private events, weddings, farmers markets …in the winter, an ice skating rink. There are several places that have this concept (outdoor pavillion)… Manassas, Virginia for one. The City would get revenue for rentals to private events and use of rink. It does not need to be cold all the time, there is a special solution that the rink company uses to create the “ice”. Private funds and/or CDBG funds could be used. Mayor Blankenship has heard this idea before… think about it… it could be a first step to re-vitalize downtown…
(Report comment)
Mick you did not know just read what has been said in the article as well as when you commented in the past on this. The City of Ironton did not keep up the building for years before moving. It has been empty for years. This is like the cruise ship that run aground. There was crew members that were in denial. This building was not taken care of for to long to where to make it useable just costs to much. That is why some of the recommendations is to save as much as the can when they tear it down. History can still be preserved even if the building is not whole. Just as I said before Ironton High was rebuilt and kept some of the old. To many people just do not have extra money as tax payers to pay for this.
(Report comment)
CollegeStudent; Best of luck on your paper pertaining to the old City Building. I think you will find this an enlightening and interesting subject. This building (Memorial Hall) is part of Ironton’s heritage. A lot of meaningful and historical memories are associated with this structure.
(Report comment)
Country; I did not know the building had been permitted to deteriorate that significantly. This does not speak very highly of leadership capabilities, but is a prime example of a parochial and backward mentality.
(Report comment)
I was told yesterday they’re going to save this build; I am getting info to write a historical document on the old build and home of Ironton.
(Report comment)
Mick great ideas. So how much money are YOU putting to this? Oh that is right you do not live here. Save it at all costs. So taking money from schools,county services, jobs and other esential things is alright with you. Or to saddle taxpayers with a debt for years to come. Also the pic that was taking is the best pic that can be taken with the shape the building is in now.
Even Ironton High School was replaced but they were able to save some of the old features of the building. This is the best for the money available.
(Report comment)
Why are we not hearing anything from our commissioner Paul Herrell? Is he ill, or does he not have any say or comment in any decision that is being made in Lawrence County?
(Report comment)
Ironton Tribune; You could have taken a much better picture of the building. This is an example of how the press can influence. Interesting.
(Report comment)
As a PS: “Where there is a will, there is a way”. There are grants available for Historical purposes and monies available for emergency and medical services, not only, Federal and State but private. Does the City or County government have an employee that stays on top of this source of monies and pursues getting it?
(Report comment)
This building should be preserved at all cost. You cannot put a monetary value on history. Grand Army of the Republic? What was that? All my ancestors fought and died for the Confederacy. “A possible use for the building would be to house a consolidation of the county’s emergency operations, including the 911 dispatchers, the emergency medical service and emergency management agency administrative offices and a newly established office for the county coroner.” Excellent idea. The architectural beauty of the building, front entrance, location and the grounds it sets on, are outstanding. It is vital that Ironton preserve it’s heritage for the betterment of future generations.
(Report comment)
Save what..?!?
A ‘NUM-NUT’ (who shall remain nameless) decided 2 years ago to TAKE THE ROOF OFF….
Because the building was falling in and was and IS IN DANGER of doing so even now.
Oh so excuse me… where are the people with umbrella’s and tarps
that are supposed to be keeping the rain out..?!?
GET REAL…
3 different City Council Members said and agreed that the building (if it couldnt be saved) would tear
it down 2yrs ago. The Basic Concensus was to go with a park with
two shelters and a nice large corner memorial wall on 4th & railroad St.
All the county could do ((IF THEY HAD THE MONEY & GRANTS ETC)) is tear it down saving the old big blocks. To re-build a newer structure for a 911 building.
Then the County could tear down all the delapadated worn out
houses on park Ave and 6th street and then the sheriff could build the BIG 3 Story New Jail that they have talked
about for the past 10 years. Then Lawrence County could
open the jail up as an ‘Inmate Hotel’ housing prisoners from
all over making some money, plus hire additional jail personnel
and put the deputies back out on the roads where they belong!
Now take this and run with it..!!
(Report comment)
I would like to see the building saved,but sometimes you must bite your lip and move forward. Dismantle it and save as much of it as possible to put into a new building that will last a very long time. I have some fond memories of that grand old building.
(Report comment)
Who gets stuck with paying for this in the end tax payers.
The City could not get the money to fix it before. Now it is even worse on getting government money to run just the day to day operations. Let’s play pass the buck and see who gets stuck with the bill.
When now County Engineer looked at it years ago he recommended that it be tore down and save many of the stones to go with a new building. Since the cost to redo the building was to high and it is even higher now.
Sure makes a lot of the people who work for the county who are asked to do with less or even lose their job because money is not there. But the County Commissioners may come up with some money and time to take on this. Learn from other cities like Huntington spending way more on to redo a building for the police station and Portsmouth in spending money they didn’t have to redo a building to become the city building.
(Report comment)
Here we go again.
The City of Ironton wants the County to bail them out, to take a building they cant afford to fix up or tear down and give it to the county for them to spend money on. This will be a rediculous waste of County money. $8,000,000 to make it useable??? You could build a 911 building for far less.
The City always over extends its self and then either wants the County to bail them out or they put more fees on the water bill to pay for the over spending. They want the County to do their dispatching for free saving the City $200,000+ but costing the County far more than that.
I say enough already. The County should not be in the business of paying for the City of Ironton’s over spending. The citizens of Ironton are so over burdened by taxes and fees that they should march in the streets and demand that the leaders get the budget in check.
(Report comment)
i am amazed that the county is considering spending money to renovate the memorial building. If the engineering consulant (EL Robinson) estimated the costs to renovate at 8 million dollars, even with the historical grants which MAY be available at 35% of the costs (2.8 million) this leaves 5.2 million for the project. I don’t know what the square footage of the building is, but considering a cost of around $190.00 per square foot for construction, it would have to be in the area of 42000 sq foot considering the dollar amount given. I realize the historical importance associated with the building, and if it was in a strickly historical area with other like buildings being restored adjacent to, or in the immediate area, this may receive special consideration, but i don’t believe this is so. Our elected officials need to learn that, like on our personal credit card, we may have X amount of dollars of available credit, it isn’t always
in our best interest to apply for and spend that money. Reguardless of the grants or other sources of state or federal moneys, ultimately it adds to our state and federal deficits, and directly to our tax burden. That is something we do not need to be doing. Ironton or the county dose’nt need to be spending this amount of money to restore a 100+ year old building when a new, more efficient structure can be built for considerably less.
(Report comment)