Archived Story
Financing plans sought for Memorial Hall project
Published 11:07am Wednesday, May 23, 2012The county commission wants to see how it could finance a possible restoration of Memorial Hall and has asked the CAO to come up with scenarios for ways that project could be paid for.
In a meeting Tuesday Commissioners Bill Pratt and Les Boggs voiced their support for restoring the structure built as a memorial to Civil War soldiers. Commissioner Freddie Hayes did not attend the meeting.
Also at the meeting were Ralph Kline of the Ironton-Lawrence County CAO, Paul Woods of the Ironton Port Authority, Bill Dickens, Ironton Economic Development director, Ashland, Ky.-based architect Shawn Walker and Carl Howard of Mi-De-Con, a commercial construction firm.
“I think it is important to try to preserve our past,” Pratt said. “But I will require a source of funding. Lawrence County is not able to borrow money or take from the general fund.”
Boggs also said he was for the project but for what he called practical reasons.
“If you look at the black and white cost and if we can get it through private entity and historical tax credits, I think it is a doable project,” Boggs said. “I think we can do it in the long run.”
Right now the building is owned by the city of Ironton but in January the county commissioners said they were considering preserving the 19th Century structure to turn it into the headquarters for the county’s emergency services.
Last week Howard said the building could be restored for a cost of almost $3.3 million. Mi-De-Con’s estimate was the third that had been requested to determine if the structure could be saved.
In 2007 a study done by E.L. Robinson Engineering for the city of Ironton put the restoration cost at $7 million with demolition at a half-million dollars. Those figures included asbestos and lead abatement. Mi-De-Con’s estimate did not include abatement.
Another evaluation was recently made by Shawn Walker & Associates who also put restoration at approximately $3 million.
Howard’s plan is to gut the building, place a steel structure inside the walls, then attach that to the exterior. The plan would also remove the wooden staircase and rebuild it to resemble the original.
Commissioners had considering paying for the restoration through grants or historical tax credits. The county has applied for a Homeland Security grant for $3 million that could go to the restoration.
“Within 30 to 60 days we will know whether we can get that,” Boggs said. “If we can get the $3 million, we don’t need the historical tax credits.”
Kline suggested having a private entity such as a port authority or economic development organization seek the funding. Then the county would enter into a lease-purchase agreement with that agency.
“(Such a private group) would not want a return on the investment,” Kline said.
He also said getting historical tax credits could cost from $250,000 to $300,000.
“Because you have to go through a syndication to find investors who will buy the tax credits” Kline said.
With a $3 million project that would be 10 percent of the project, he said.
The commissioners asked Kline to come up a variety of financing plans for a meeting Tuesday, June 12 at 1:30 p.m. at commission chambers.
“It is important people understand this is part of a plan,” Boggs said. “We need to look at the future. This is not a fly-by-night decision. It is part of a bigger plan for EMS, 911 and EMA.”




First of all, looking at the ‘man meeting’ that was held regarding the fate of the historic building, I think that women in this county also need to be included in projects, whether they are with the County Historical Society or other related business.
Second, I commend the county commissioners for understanding the value of preserving Ironton’s and the county’s history — and an awesome building!
Third, I completely disagree with the Robinson information and if you look at some of these contractors that the county wants to hire, they have to sub-contract out just about everything they do including the abatements. So they sub it out and then mark up their cost 100%. I think the county might get a better deal if they go with a contractor that has multiple capabilities. Otherwise, I would hire each part of the project separately to cut costs.
A new contractor that has set up an office in Ironton is Northwind Environmental Consultants/Engineering. Their reputation far exceeds some of these existing contractors I keep reading about, the company is owned by a native American female, and they have capabilities of multi-tasking, although I don’t think they are in the restoration business. BUT, a big part of the project will be demo and abatement.
Northwind is made up of a group of capable professionals and not a fly-by-night company set up by a local dump truck driver.
I would like to see a company like Northwind hired for the county Brownfield projects to replace Keramida.
(Report comment)