noble

Archived Story

‘Big Lie’ destroying ‘American Dream’

Published 8:56am Friday, July 27, 2012

There is a serious debate underlying the mean-spirited, shallow, attack ad presidential campaign this year. Unfortunately, even the terms of the discussion may remain hidden under the opaque fabric of the “Big Lie.”

The big lie is the conservative argument that all government is bad.

Under that rubric conservatives argue that we only need to reduce the size and cost of government in order to live happily even after and re-start the American Dream of social mobility.

The American Dream, the promise that hard work can bring about personal success and even wealth, is one that has empowered Americans for generations. This vision of economic success is founded in the historical development of the most vibrant, successful, middle class ever created.

Yet today that dream of social mobility is more likely to be found in Australia, or Canada, or Germany, Denmark, Norway, Sweden or Finland, where social upward economic mobility has a far greater chance for their citizens than Americans have now.

A recent study by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development presents the facts of economic mobility, and those facts indicate that while the American Dream is in jeopardy here, it is thriving in these other Western democracies and on the Australian continent.

What do these economies have in common that is different from America?

All of them have social policies the American political Right would call “socialist.”

They each guarantee citizens health care, a policy that frees business start-ups from having to fear health crises for their families while building new careers.

They each have stronger union movements that fight for economic equality for the fruits of labor and seek to avoid the American plight of the concentration of wealth in fewer and fewer American families.

Each of these nations has more generous welfare states, providing security for those in work transitions, skills training, and protection in times of economic hardship that occur even in highly productive lives.

In most of these nations there are deeper commitments to the relationship of labor to management, with strong apprenticeship programs and corporate participation in workers’ development and concern over workers issues and success.

And in all cases these nations levy higher taxes.

In American, where we have the lowest tax rates in 60 years, the smallest percentage of GDP committed to funding government in decades, and shrinking numbers of government employees, there is the Big Lie that prevents us from solving our debt and deficit crisis. It is the same Big Lie that is shrinking the American Dream while the dream prospers in these other nations.

The truth is we need Social Security after the end of private pension programs, the failure of 401K investments, and the loss of so much home retirement equity.

We need Medicare to insure that those who most need health care are not denied access to some of the worlds best health care.

And equally important we need to update our failing infrastructure to serve our global competitiveness.

Beyond these basics we also need to fund research efforts, efforts that have been shrinking in funding for decades if we are to remain competitive with nations dedicated to supporting research.

And the government must have a role in the infrastructure of our educational system, insuring our facilities, our student materials, and our use of educational technology allow every American child a full and fair chance to compete in the global economy.

This presidential election should be about the direction of the nation…are we moving even farther towards an economic elite, or are we to re-commit to a vibrant middle class with a living American Dream.

But first we need to stop telling the Big Lie.

 

Jim Crawford is a retired educator and political enthusiast living here in the Tri-State.

 

 

  1. mickakers

    mikehaney; I am not an admirer of Dinesh D’Souza, but I did find insight in his comment “It is a real mystery how he (Obama) managed to convince so many Americans to vote for him, and how some of his deepest beliefs have gone unscrutinized.”

    (Report comment)

  2. Noesis

    Keta:
    Right, probably the same sources that revealed to him that Hillary is a lesbian whose husband beats her. You need to learn to distinguish between journalism and hate speech.
    ————

    Wasn’t that your same excuse when Klein said that the Obama campaign offered to pay Wright $250,000 to shut up until after the election? Didn’t you poo-poo the existence of the tapes back then? You sure did get quiet after the tapes were played on TV.

    As usual, you attempt to attack the messenger when you can’t dispute the message.

    (Report comment)

  3. keta

    which Klein says he has on tape
    ———————————————————-
    Right, probably the same sources that revealed to him that Hillary is a lesbian whose husband beats her. You need to learn to distinguish between journalism and hate speech.

    (Report comment)

  4. Noesis

    Maybe because it’s stuff like this Keta:

    author Ed Klein said Barack Obama’s former pastor helped Obama accept Christianity without having to renounce Islam.
    The Daily Caller reported:
    Klein also said Wright told him he “made it comfortable” for Obama to accept Christianity without having renounce his “Islamic background,” which Klein said he has on tape.

    (Report comment)

  5. keta

    and how some of his deepest beliefs have gone unscrutinized
    ———————————————————–

    That’s an odd statement. I can’t think of anybody else in public life who is disbelieved when he talks about his faith. Or anybody else whose every word, every casual relationship, has been scrutinized for evidence proving he’s a socialist, a communist, a muslim, whatever’s up that day. The father he never knew makes him muslim for some people. Donald Trump hinted for a while that he didn’t exist; How come nobody knew this guy? Then he switched to whether he was a citizen who deserved to be president, then to whether he’d actually earned the grades to deserve his ivy league education. There’s a lot of anger about his family vacations, which are far fewer than Dubyah’s. The gist of it is, who does this guy think he is, flying his family to vacation spots at the taxpayers’ expense? It’s silly to deny that there’s a big chunk of America that is deeply angry that the Obamas live in the White House and do all the things our presidents and their families have always done. Romney is working it for all he’s worth: This guy doesn’t understand us, he’s remarkably foreign, he’s not like us. IMHO, it’s a strategy that looks bad and sounds bad and is astonishingly self-defeating. Birthers and other conspiracy theorists are already convinced, and those old white people are a demographic that keeps getting smaller. You can’t build a party on hate and fear, or campaign on it, with nothing else to offer. Somebody more likable, whom people could relate to, would have been nice. Everybody else was impossible: Bachmann, Cain, Perry, Gingrich. It’s true that Mitt was the best of the bunch.

    (Report comment)

  6. Noesis

    mickakers JULY 30, 2012 AT 7:05 PM LINK
    Lech Walesa, the co-founder of the Solidarity Movement and former Polish President also a winner of the Nobel Peace Prize, effectively endorsed Romney for President.
    —————–

    On NPR, it was reported that the trip was racist in nature:

    Cokie Roberts: Well, I think part of it was a desire to portray President Obama as something of a wimp, and say he’s abandoned Eastern Europe. But look, you remember well the Reagan Democrats. Those ethnic white voters who had been Democrats for many years; turned out for Ronald Reagan, and have been fairly predictable Republicans since then. Now it’s a smaller percentage of the population — of the voting population — than it used to be, but white voters are still much more Republican than any other group in the electorate. They went for McCain in 2008 by 55%. And I think that getting those ethnic voters excited is really what Romney has in mind here. It’s more for the folks at home — the descendents of the people that he will be speaking to — in Poland.
    —————-

    The liberal media is getting desperate!

    (Report comment)

  7. mikehaney

    “The reason we called it ‘2016’ is because we want audiences to question what the implications are, and what the world would look like in 2016 if he is re-elected,” D’Souza said. “It is a real mystery how he managed to convince so many Americans to vote for him, and how some of his deepest beliefs have gone unscrutinized.”
    ———————————————-
    The best part of above,“It is a real mystery how he managed to convince so many Americans to vote for him”.
    Can you imagine Obama being re-elected with no concerns of another election? A real nightmare.

    (Report comment)

  8. keta

    Walesa..endorsed Romney
    ————————————————————

    He came close. Walesa is in a snit over a medal he wasn’t permitted to present, among other things. Hopefully Mitt managed to charm somebody over there. 68% of American Jews preferred Obama to Romney BEFORE Mitt went to Israel and acted like a clueless rube.

    (Report comment)

  9. mikehaney

    Looks like indie is reverting back to his childhood.
    Double,double dare you to step over the line. The adults in this forum have outgrown such things, except indie.

    (Report comment)

  10. mickakers

    Lech Walesa, the co-founder of the Solidarity Movement and former Polish President also a winner of the Nobel Peace Prize, effectively endorsed Romney for President.

    (Report comment)

  11. keta

    And where did the tax money come from
    ———————————————————

    That’s the point, it came from everybody who pays property taxes, sales taxes, income taxes, payroll taxes. It’s silly to ignore the fact that our economic system is capitalism/socialism combo, has been for close to a hundred years. You can’t receive social security and depend on medicare and go around demanding that government stay out of your health care. Well, you can, many do, but it’s ridiculous. I’d agree that Krauthammer would prefer Romney to the president, but he’s obviously disgusted with Romney and wishes somebody else was the candidate.

    (Report comment)

  12. mickakers

    indieVoter; Your challenge would be a difficult one to accept. I don’t think Romney has the charisma to overcome that of Obama. This appears to be the essential ingredient that influences American voters, sad to say. The Democratic Party is considering adding the approval of Same Sex Marriage to their platform following President Obama’s endorsement. The Democratic Party of today is not the Democratic Party of yore.

    (Report comment)

  13. Noesis

    Keta, I’m fairly certain that Charles would rather have Romney over Obambi any day of the week.

    And where did the tax money come from? Does the government have a gold mine where they get money from? Or, are businesses and people paying the taxes? In reality businesses did pay for the roads.

    (Report comment)

  14. keta

    200 points above Crawford; Charles Krauthammer
    ———————————————————-

    This isn’t the kind of thing you’d ever admit to here, but Krauthammer often seems as mystified by Romney’s statements as Crawford does. Krauthammer is a bright fellow and a good writer, but he’s never been a fan of Romney’s – he doesn’t consider him a conservative, and he’s right. Krauthammer gets carried away by his own rhetoric when it comes to the president, as in his description of the president’s belief that the the state is “the font of entrepreneurial success”. That is, that the state is where success springs from, a goofy exaggeration. People don’t often build businesses in the wilderness. Taxes pay for civilization- public safety, traffic flow, infrastructure maintenance, etc. Business owners didn’t create those things, they just really need them. Krauthammer gets kind of hysterical when it comes to the president.

    (Report comment)

  15. Man you guys are hilarious. All foam and no beer? Mr wishy washy?? Haha!

    I just wanna know one thing. Are ya really sure that you can beat Barack Obama this fall??

    I’d really like to know. If you are so sure he is “that bad” it should be an easy bet. Tell you what…I have a bet for Noesis, haney, tiger or any of the rest of you who has the courage to back your talk. If you’re sure Obama is a bad president and will lose to Romney, take the pepsi challenge my friend.

    The challenge, if you choose to accept it, is this. If Obama wins this fall you can’t say anything but good about him for the next four years. I don’t mean that “fox news” type of stuff either like…”he’s really good at hiding his birth certificate.” No, you have to be specific and substantive in all the good things you say about him for the next four years.

    If one of you takes the challenge and Romney wins, I will say nothing but good about him for the next four years.

    So, for the viewing audience at home, do any of you really believe Obama will beaten? Do you accept the challenge??

    Here comes the fun part. Let’s see how they squirm out of this one…

    (Report comment)

    • Noesis

      So you want us to lie?

      (Report comment)

      • “Let’s see how they squirm out of this one… ”
        - There was one.

        (Report comment)

      • Noesis

        So how would this work? If the job numbers under Obamba deceased by 10,000 I’d have to say “See what a great job with the economy he’s doing?

        (Report comment)

    • …and there was two.

      See, even these big talkers know Obama is gonna win. They would rather die than have to spend the next four years congratulating the President on accomplishments.

      “Hey Mr. President, thanks for calling the shot to get Bin Laden…”

      “Thank you for saving America’s auto industry Mr. President…”

      Yeah, you know they couldn’t be trusted to keep their word on something like that anyway. On the other hand, if their guy would get into office they would gladly cheer them on no matter how badly they did (like Bush).

      (Report comment)

  16. Noesis

    Looks like we have another “Big Lie”! Remember the “Guttiest call EVER!” Taking down OBL?

    Guess who is Mr Wishy-Washy?

    At the urging of senior advisor Valerie Jarrett, President Barack Obama canceled the operation to kill Osama bin Laden on three separate occasions before finally approving the May 2, 2011 Navy SEAL mission, according to a new book scheduled for release August 21, The Daily Caller (DC) reported. 

    (Report comment)

  17. mikehaney

    Crawford:And the government must have a role in the infrastructure of our educational system, insuring our facilities, our student materials, and our use of educational technology allow every American child a full and fair chance to compete in the global economy.
    ———————————————-
    On our educational system. Everyone is aware of elite grade and high schools; where high tuition, great teachers held responsible, hard working and busy students
    and very dedicated responsible parents turn out future leaders.
    Of course the first argument is not everyone can pay. Ok; if the gov’t could solve the tuition problem for most and keep everything else the same, our system would see a dramatic improvement. This would not be a all size fits all, but would be a start. Take anything else out of the equation and it won’t work.
    One size school system just has not worked. How can one school handle;poor and good teachers, performing and energetic students and poor students, dedicated and hard working parents and the worthless parents.

    And repeating the tuition problem. I’m not saying the gov’t is capable of running a school, just equalize the money part and monitor performance.

    At least the financially poor family would get an equal start with the financially well off, where everything else is equal.

    (Report comment)

  18. Noesis

    We have a President who is all foam and no beer.

    (Report comment)

  19. mickakers

    Noesis; As an afterthought. I don’t think President Obama deserved the Nobel prize. I feel this belittled the prestige of this award as it belittled the University Of Notre Dame in honoring him. There is something wrong here. We have lowered our standards.

    (Report comment)

    • Noesis

      Just like the Nobel prize, our standards were lowered electing Obambi.

      (Report comment)

  20. mickakers

    Thank you Noesis for correcting me (rather gentle, by the way). You are correct about Obama winning the Nobel rather than the Pulitzer. The Pulitzer is reserved for Journalism and Literature.

    (Report comment)

  21. Noesis

    Ah Mick, Charles might have won a Pulitzer but Obama I don’t believe did. Did you mean the Nobel for Obama?

    (Report comment)

  22. mickakers

    As an interesting PS: Jim Crawford is a mixed bag. Aren’t we all?

    (Report comment)

  23. mickakers

    Solange Robillard; The interesting thing about government is, “WE” are the government. If we can’t trust ourselves, who “CAN” we trust?

    (Report comment)

  24. mickakers

    Noesis; Charles Krauthammer? A distinguished gentleman. Also a mixed bag. He supports the killing of the unborn (abortion). He supports Embryonic Stem Cell research. He was awarded the Pulitzer Prize, just like, President Barack Obama. I would hesitate putting his “IQ 200 points above Crawford”.

    (Report comment)

  25. Solange Robillard

    You’re right, Jim Crawford, let’s implicitly trust government with everything about our lives. I agree. I am just so glad that it is the one giant, powerful, obscenely wealthy corporation in this country that is utterly without fault. Cheers.

    (Report comment)

  26. Noesis

    Actually Mick, there’s somebody whose IQ is about 200 points above Crawford: Charles Krauthammer

    …Moreover, the greatest threat to a robust, autonomous civil society is the ever-growing Leviathan state and those like Obama who see it as the ultimate expression of the collective.

    Obama compounds the fallacy by declaring the state to be the font of entrepreneurial success. How so? It created the infrastructure — roads, bridges, schools, Internet — off which we all thrive.

    Absurd. We don’t credit the Swiss postal service with the Special Theory of Relativity because it transmitted Einstein’s manuscript to the Annalen der Physik. Everyone drives the roads, goes to school, uses the mails. So did Steve Jobs. Yet only he created the Mac and the iPad.

    Obama’s infrastructure argument is easily refuted by what is essentially a controlled social experiment. Roads and schools are the constant. What’s variable is the energy, enterprise, risk-taking, hard work and genius of the individual. It is therefore precisely those individual characteristics, not the communal utilities, that account for the different outcomes.

    The ultimate Obama fallacy, however, is the conceit that belief in the value of infrastructure — and willingness to invest in its creation and maintenance — is what divides liberals from conservatives.

    More nonsense. Infrastructure is not a liberal idea, nor is it particularly new. The Via Appia was built 2,300 years ago. The Romans built aqueducts, too. And sewers. Since forever, infrastructure has been consensually understood to be a core function of government.

    The argument between left and right is about what you do beyond infrastructure. It’s about transfer payments and redistributionist taxation, about geometrically expanding entitlements, about tax breaks and subsidies to induce actions pleasing to central planners. It’s about free contraceptives for privileged students and welfare without work — the latest Obama entitlement-by-decree that would fatally undermine the great bipartisan welfare reform of 1996. It’s about endless government handouts that, ironically, are crowding out necessary spending on, yes, infrastructure.

    (Report comment)

  27. mickakers

    Noesis & tiger534; I fear your lack of comprehension is showing. Jim Crawford’s statement “The big lie is the conservative argument that all government is bad”. Is followed by “Under that rubic (I emphasize “that rubic”)conservatives argue that we only need to reduce the size and cost of government in order to live happily ever after and re-start the American dream of social mobility”. Before jumping to conclusions, please read a little more carefully.

    (Report comment)

    • mikehaney

      Rawford:The big lie is the conservative argument that all government is bad.
      —————————–

      Mick, this is a one sentence paragraph. How can you read it otherwise??

      (Report comment)

  28. mickakers

    Jim Crawford; A well thought out and researched article. I think you covered all bases, Economically and Medically speaking. Also, a fair amount of Social and Equality issues. There is one “Big” problem, many countries of the world, including the United States, participate in and encourage the killing of the unborn. This inhuman act negates all other advancements. Without the right to life, all other rights are immaterial.

    (Report comment)

    • mikehaney

      And Mick, how many of these 50 million babies could have led us to a better future one day? God only knows.

      (Report comment)

  29. tiger534

    That has to be one of dumbest statements I have ever heard that all conservatives think govv’t is bad. Where did this Noises come from under a rock that was made only for morons? Well all Gov’t is not bad only the ones like the what the Obama administration wants. That is what is it is socialism and heading toward what the Nazis wanted when they eliminated anyone that disagreed which is what I see with this slim bucket that is called a writer. Seems that the editor here is as much too blame as anyone as he continues to allow this persons views but does not really have a counter part. Seems that the herald dispatch is a much more quality paper as it posits both sides unlike this truly liberal paper that seems more like the New York times then a paper that represents the people.

    (Report comment)

    • Noesis

      Stu (for stupid), learn to read. Crawford said that not me.

      (Report comment)

  30. Noesis

    Here is the biggest lie of them all:

    Crawford “The big lie is the conservative argument that all government is bad.”

    No Jim that would be anarchists.

    Republicans believe in smaller government, not no government. Democrats believe in regulating every aspect of your life, to the point where you can’t even start a business.

    (Report comment)

  31. mikehaney

    Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development

    UN Agenda 21?

    At Risk:
    •Private Property ownership
    •Single-Family homes
    •Private car ownership and individual travel choices
    •Privately owned farms
    ——————————————-
    Sounds too good to be true? Don’t know, but worth delving into a little further. OECD is heavy into our college campuses. What are the truths and pitfalls?

    (Report comment)

Editor's Picks

Tribune news editor dies after cancer fight

Veteran journalist and news editor of The Tribune Teresa Moore, 51, died this morning at the Community Hospice Care Center in Ashland, Ky., following a ... Read more  | 1 comment