Archived Story

Romney running against self

Published 1:10pm Wednesday, October 31, 2012

There’s a myth in the right-wing-o-sphere that President Obama was never fully vetted. “We don’t know ANYTHING about this guy!” they’ll say, and in the same breath make fun of the fact he wrote two autobiographies.

My answer to this is always: “He ran against a Clinton.”

Any skeletons, dirt, deal killers or weaknesses were dug up, dragged out and made public during their exhaustive primary. In spite of all of this Obama still won the nomination of his party. He won against a Clinton; a distinction not too many people have.

You’ll still hear Obama detractors say they don’t know him. “The president still doesn’t have an agenda for a second term,” said Mitt Romney last week.

The president has laid out his plan for a second term during his convention speech, stump speeches, interviews — there’s even a brochure.

But the Right claims it’s Obama who’s being cryptic. Secretive. There’s a scandal-obsessed media — an entire industry ready to pounce on the slightest misstep of any notable but somehow they’ve all conspired to protect Obama from scrutiny.

Sure.

But as far as Romney goes, I really don’t know who this dude is: I’ve watched dozens of speeches, read hundreds of articles and sat through 23 national debates and I can’t tell you where Romney stands on any issue.

And it’s not for lack of trying or just general contempt (which I suspect is the reason some on the right feign ignorance of Obama’s positions), it’s from too many answers to every question.

I had assumed Romney was just going to sell himself as the opposite of Obama. I based this on his odd claim that he will repeal ObamaCare, the health care law modeled after the reforms Romney implemented while governor of Massachusetts.

That seems arbitrary rather than reasoned policy, so I expected that would be the theme: Romney the not-Obama.

“The president has communicated weakness,” says Romney on Obama’s foreign policy. But then during the foreign policy debate-in-name-only Romney happily agreed with Obama on everything from the withdrawal date in Afghanistan to drone strikes. On Egypt: “I believe, as the president indicated, and said at the time that I supported his — his action there,” relayed Romney.

Romney has mainly been running against himself on YouTube. For every position he’s held, he’s also fervently held the opposite — effortlessly switching sans explanation.

He’s a candidate who was for the Lilly Ledbetter Act, then against it, then neutral. He’s been both for and against minimum wage increases; for and against the auto bail out; for and against gun control; for and against the Bush Tax Cuts; for and against a woman’s right to choose; for and against more tax cuts; for and against Reagan.

I was asked to speak at a high school a few weeks ago and the civics students earnestly wanted to know where Romney stood on the issues and I really wanted to help them. One of the teachers asked if it’s more instructive to look at what Romney says when he thinks there’s no camera or when he knows there is one. I told him it might be the former. But I’m not sure. Mainly I just threw my hands up and said, “Look, I’m not a spokesperson for his campaign.”

You can’t go by what Romney has said because he’s said a lot of things … most of which contradict each other.

You can’t go by his record because it’s even further from what he’s said (he never raised taxes while governor just tons of “fees”). What’s left is a debate over what you think he might mean versus what he really might mean. If you value evidence at all — this is “sketchy” territory. It’s all speculation and reading between the lies.

Yet everyone seems to have their theory as to who the real Romney is: He’s a moderate — he’s a hard-line right-winger — he’s a vulture capitalist — peacenik, etc. But who is he really? What would he actually do as president? He’s untethered from all his former statements (including ones made minutes ago) so it’s anyone’s guess.

Because Romney has been on all sides of every issue, he’s lined up perfectly with his opponent at one time or another.

The only way Romney has been clear is by diluting his positions beyond recognition. Just by continuing to say inconsistent things (and plenty of them) the only thing we can all be certain of is he’s not Obama.

It’s an intellectual impossibility to vote for Romney because there’s no telling what he’s actually for. He really is just a not-Obama.

 

Tina Dupuy is an award-winning writer and the editor-in-chief of TheContributor.com. Tina can be reached at tinadupuy@yahoo.com.

 

 

  1. Noesis

    Does that mean Obama has government in his blood since his father worked for the Kenyan government?

    (Report comment)

  2. mickakers

    Mitt Romney has politics in his blood. His father, George W. Romney was a Republican Governor of the state of Michigan. Mitt’s first attempt in the political arena was in 1994 when he ran for the senate (Mass.), losing to Ted Kennedy. He was Governor of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, elected in 2002 and leaving office after 2006 to pursue the Republican nomination in 2008 presidential race losing to John McCain. While serving as Governor of Mass. he endorsed and signed into law the most comprehensive and beneficial Health Care systems in the United States.

    (Report comment)

  3. mikehaney

    “Romney running against self”
    Of course he is. As a non politician he messes up and speaks the truth.

    (Report comment)

  4. keta

    Duh. Mitt is a salesman. His market is whoever he’s talking to at the time. Nothing complicated about Mitt.

    (Report comment)

  5. mikehaney

    “The president began what I would call an apology tour, going to the Middle East and blaming America,” Romney said. “I think when the president said he was going to create daylight between ourselves and Israel, they noticed that.

    “We’re four years closer to a nuclear Iran,” Romney said. “The reason I call it an apology tour is because you went to the Middle East. You skipped Israel and they noticed that.

    “Number two, Mr. President, the reason I call it an apology tour is because you went to the Middle East and you flew to — to Egypt and to Saudi Arabia and to — to Turkey and Iraq. And — and by way, you skipped Israel, our closest friend in the region, but you went to the other nations. And by the way, they noticed that you skipped Israel. And then in those nations and on Arabic TV you said that America had been dismissive and derisive. You said that on occasion America had dictated to other nations. Mr. President, America has not dictated to other nations. We have freed other nations from dictators.”

    Looking uncomfortable, Obama quipped, “Nothing Governor Romney has said just now is true. The strength we’ve shown in Iran is the way that we’ve been able to organize the world.”
    ——————————
    Tina Dupuy-He really is just a not-Obama. (no-kidding)

    (Report comment)

  6. mikehaney

    During a speech in Springfield, Ohio, Obama talked about the Clinton administration and its economic plan that “asked the wealthiest Americans to pay a little bit more.” Then he mentioned Mitt Romney, drawing boos from the crowd.

    “No, no, no — don’t boo, vote,” Obama said. “Vote. Voting is the best revenge.”
    ———————————-
    If Obama is not more careful on what he says; he may end up on Homeland Security’s “no fly list”.

    (Report comment)

    • Noesis

      Revenge? Revenge for what? Because he ran against “The chosen one”?

      (Report comment)

  7. mickakers

    bigkahuna; I have been thinking quite a bit about this lately and have come to the conclusion that you are right. Take Care.

    (Report comment)

  8. bigkahuna

    Mick,It is hell when we get old ain’t it.

    (Report comment)

  9. mickakers

    Tina; lessor should be lesser. I have a weakness when it comes to spelling.

    (Report comment)

  10. mickakers

    Tina Dupuy; An interesting and thought provoking article. We do know where President Barack Obama stands on three vitally important issues. He is Pro-Abortion, Pro Same Sex Marriage and supports the disregard of freedom of conscience when it comes to religious beliefs as demonstrated in Obama-Care. Is there a possibility that it boils down to the lessor of two evils?

    (Report comment)

Editor's Picks

DNA group has second meeting

More than 40 people attended the second Death to Negative Attitudes (DNA) meeting on Thursday at the Ro-Na Theater. Many of the same people along ... Read more

Barker selected as Memorial Day Parade honorary grand marshal

The selection committee has chosen Hardy Barker as Honorary Grand Marshal of the Ironton Memorial Day Parade, the oldest continually held Memorial Day Parade in ... Read more

Global Warming?

  Temperatures still climbing despite subzero conditions nationally   Despite a cold snap that seems to be gripping the entire nation, experts like Ohio State ... Read more  | 4 comments