Archived Story

Voters are ones behind curtain

Published 9:17am Tuesday, November 13, 2012

Conservatives can be forgiven for seeking to rationalize Mitt Romney’s loss – “media were against him,” “the primaries dragged on too long,” “Paul Ryan was a poor choice,” “Seamus ate his master’s homework,” whatever. But progressives should bite their tongues.

Late on election night Chris Matthews of MSNBC blurted out that he was “glad we had that storm last week,” implying that Hurricane Sandy was partly responsible for President Obama’s win. He apologized profusely the next day. Meanwhile, his network and its competitors are spending much of their post-election time focusing on the science of campaigning, as if Tuesday’s vote occurred in some exotic computer lab.

Liberal pundits are gushing over the “Chicago team” that crunched numbers, targeted voters in the right places, and engineered a carefully calculated win. On Fox, Bill O’Reilly stated flatly that if Obama’s guru David Axelrod had been running Romney’s campaign, the Republican would have won.

Both sides make the election sound like a game in which the American people are chess pieces – mostly pawns.

The science of campaigning is growing exponentially, there’s no doubt about that. Howard Dean is often cited as the first major candidate to harness the Internet for his 2004 presidential bid, building what came to be known as a Netroots campaign and using the Internet to spread messages, raise money, and track voters.

Obama’s 2008 campaign took it farther and, for the 2012 race – with more time, money and tools – the president’s staff ran the most sophisticated campaign in history.

Of course, it was also the most expensive, with over $2 billion spent by the two parties and their backers. In Iowa, for example, it’s estimated that the final price of each Electoral vote was $12.3 million.

But money couldn’t buy this election any more than computer science was able to engineer it. Karl Rove’s super PAC spent over $100 million on television ads, and came away with what the Sunlight Foundation computes was about a 1 percent return on investment.

Despite the spending and demographic targeting, this election may have been one of the most democratic ever. It was, from the start, about issues. It was about the clear philosophical differences regarding how government should work, and a majority of voters indicated they share the president’s views.

But even in conceding that much, some conservatives point out how this philosophy divides demographically, and all of a sudden we’re back on the chessboard.

The suggestion is that demographic groups – blacks, Latinos, young women – who voted heavily for the president, simply weren’t “targeted” properly. That if they had somehow gotten the message, things would have turned out differently.

They got the message. And no amount of advertising, spinning or even intimidating could change it.

There’s an even more sinister angle at work here, grabbing space on conservative blogs and being whispered about on cable-TV. It seems to hint that the coalition of minorities that backed Obama is somehow less American, less deserving of an equal say. “The moochers re-elected Obama,” is how one blogger put it.

Rush Limbaugh, bombastic mouthpiece for the far right, acknowledged the situation. “If we’re not getting the female vote,” he asked his radio listeners, “do we become pro-choice? Do we start passing out birth control pills? Is that what we have to do?”

The best thing that can be said about Limbaugh and his followers is that they are not willing to compromise their beliefs. Voters recognized that in rejecting not only the top of the GOP ticket but also many extremists down below.

Thus, with due respect to Karl Rove’s checkbook and David Axelrod’s computer, it seems Americans can be manipulated only so far. If the puppeteers on either side hope that voters will pay no attention to the man behind the curtain, they overlook the fact that the real force behind the voting booth curtain is you.


Peter Funt is a writer and speaker and can be reached at

The Tribune believes it is possible for people with a variety of points of view to discuss issues in a civil manner and will remove comments that, in our opinion, foster incivility. We want to encourage an open exchange of information and ideas. Responsibility for what is posted or contributed to this site is the sole responsibility of each user. By contributing to this website, you agree not to post any defamatory, abusive, harassing, obscene, sexual, threatening or illegal material, or any other material that infringes on the ability of others to enjoy this site, or that infringes on the rights of others. Any user who feels that a contribution to this website is a violation of these terms of use is encouraged to email, or click the "report comment" link that is on all comments. We reserve the right to remove messages that violate these terms of use and we will make every effort to do so — within a reasonable time frame — if we determine that removal is necessary.

  • mickakers

    deist; Your comment pertaining to President Obama pushing for equality and fairness for all, I find lacking in perception. President Obama’s endorsement and support of the killing of the unborn (abortion) is not demonstrative of equality and fairness for all. The fact of the matter is, it equates with murder. Religion cannot be subjugated to “our hearts and our churches,” religion cannot be categorized, it must be lived.

    (Report comment)

  • deist

    No, you are wrong. President Obama pushes for equality and fairness for all citizens, not just Christian citizens. This not a Christian nation. Never has been, and never will be. It is a diverse nation of all people. The Framers wanted it that way. President Obama is following the mandate not only from the last election, but from our Framers. Keep religion where it is supposed to be, in our hearts and our churches , and keep it out of the places our Framers wanted to keep it out of and that is our Government.

    (Report comment)

  • mikehaney

    hey Mick. We’re in the minority.
    The election may be over, but the time of choosing has just begun. While none of us can predict what the next four years will hold, we can safely assume that the President will try to make good on his promise “fundamentally transform America.” As our country has come to understand, the path to that transformation leads straight through the heart of the church. The nation made its decision, however poorly, and now Christians must too. President Obama has made it abundantly clear–through his legislation and regulations, his public remarks, and even the full weight of his judicial team–that he believes religion and conscience should take a back seat to his pro-abortion, pro-homosexual, anti-freedom agenda.
    Hisory sure repeats itself. First step,break em down. State comes first, before religion and family.

    (Report comment)

  • mickakers

    This is an excellent headline “Voters are ones behind curtain.” I think this was exemplified by the results.

    (Report comment)

  • mickakers

    Noesis; Where you at??? Your week sabbatical is up. Your poignant comments are missed, at least by me and I disagree with you ninety per cent of the time. We all can’t be right, you have my sympathy.

    (Report comment)

  • mickakers

    Peter Funk; The American People are primarily “manipulated” by their own selfishness. There is a lack of knowledge, maturity, responsibility and self-discipline, giving way to relativity.

    (Report comment)

Editor's Picks

Finding the money: Boggs wants ideas on how to pay for new jail

Coming up with a specified way to fund building a county jail is the next step in the process, according to jail committee chair Les ... Read more

Feds will prosecute former officers

With three former Lawrence County corrections officers under federal indictment, the county won’t proceed with its case against them. “The charges we filed were similar ... Read more