Archived Story

Deficit reduction plan should be primary focus

Published 2:07pm Friday, November 30, 2012

Would it really be so much to ask that President Barack Obama and congressional leaders drop the “Gunfight at the O.K. Corral” act? Couldn’t they just forget the posturing and get to work on a deficit reduction package that includes fixes to everything else looming at the edge of the “fiscal cliff”?

Alas, it probably is too much to ask. The problems are enormous and have been allowed to fester for decades.

The election left a divided White House and Congress in status quo-ante. Lobbyists are lined up from K Street to the Capitol, each one representing interests that insist on being left whole, or better. To mix a couple of metaphors, there are too many fingers in the pie and too many oxen that stand to be gored.

That all of this could be allowed to drag on through the holidays, with the same kind of sniping that characterized the last two years, simply would be reprehensible.

Sooner or later, everyone will have to accept some variation of 2010’s Simpson-Bowles deficit reduction plan. It should be sooner….

The precise mix of tax cuts, spending cuts and loophole-closings is subject to negotiation, and that’s what should be taking place right now.

Put Simpson-Bowles on the table, invite key leaders into the room, lock the doors and don’t let anyone out until it’s done.

Spare us the drama.

The Lima News

The Tribune believes it is possible for people with a variety of points of view to discuss issues in a civil manner and will remove comments that, in our opinion, foster incivility. We want to encourage an open exchange of information and ideas. Responsibility for what is posted or contributed to this site is the sole responsibility of each user. By contributing to this website, you agree not to post any defamatory, abusive, harassing, obscene, sexual, threatening or illegal material, or any other material that infringes on the ability of others to enjoy this site, or that infringes on the rights of others. Any user who feels that a contribution to this website is a violation of these terms of use is encouraged to email, or click the "report comment" link that is on all comments. We reserve the right to remove messages that violate these terms of use and we will make every effort to do so — within a reasonable time frame — if we determine that removal is necessary.

  • indieVoter

    Here’s why that HAS to include a small tax increase (from 36% to 39.6%) for the richest of the rich. The richest 5% of all Americans own a full 60% of the wealth. If you’re going to raise revenue, you have to go where the money is at.

    Here’s the proof:,_2007.jpg

    If you want to cut spending I say FINE. Start with corporate welfare and military spending by ending the practice of serving as the world police (which is for the benefit of multinational corporations) and start using our military as it was intended…national defense here on our home soil.

    Let the world take care of itself.

    ps – If we have a real, viable independent candidate this time around, I’m going with them. I don’t want to go back to Bush or Clinton and we’re definitely going to see Jeb vs Hillary in ’16.

    (Report comment)

Editor's Picks

Chris Smith honored for work in recycling

This year’s Kudos for Caring award from the Lawrence-Scioto Solid Waste Management District went to Chris Smith of South Point. “Each year we recognize an ... Read more