Archived Story

Goff murder conviction upheld

Published 11:27am Thursday, January 10, 2013

The Ohio Fourth District Court of Appeals upheld the 2011 murder conviction of Megan Goff.

Monday, the court returned a 27-page opinion overruling Goff’s appeal, ending her right to appeal her case in the future.

“This ends her appeals as a matter of right,” said Brigham Anderson, Lawrence County Prosecuting Attorney. “Meaning she can still request the Supreme Court of Ohio to hear it, but they don’t have to hear it. It would be discretionary.”

On March 17, 2006, Goff went to the home of her estranged husband, Bill Goff, and shot him 15 times. Bill Goff died as a result of multiple gunshot wounds. She claimed she acted in self-defense and that she had been abused during their marriage, claiming battered woman’s syndrome.

In May of that year, Goff was convicted of aggravated murder following a bench trial by Visiting Judge Fred Crow, who sentenced her to life in prison with the possibility of parole after 33 years.

That conviction was overturned by the Supreme Court of Ohio on the grounds a witness for the prosecution, a psychiatrist, was allowed to testify on issues he should not have and a new trial was ordered.

Goff’s jury trial began in August 2011 and she was found guilty of murder and sentenced to life in prison with parole eligibility after 15 years. Because she used a gun to commit her crime, an automatic three years was added to the 15, making her parole eligibility possible after 18 years.

In Goff’s latest appeal, she argued that the trial court made errors in including a “duty to retreat” in its self-defense instruction. Goff claimed she did not have a duty to retreat because she was in her own home when the incident occurred.

However, the court of appeals felt there was enough evidence presented at the trial that proved Goff had moved from the residence and had no intention of returning.

Goff also argued the trial court should have dismissed her indictment due to the grand jury proceedings not being fully recorded and that there was improper testimony; that the trial court erred by not instructing the jury on the so-called imperfect self-defense doctrine; the trial court’s jury instruction for murder presented the jury from considering whether Goff committed voluntary manslaughter; and that the trial court erred by denying her motion to disqualify the Lawrence County Prosecutor’s Office and Detective Aaron Bollinger.

The appeal’s court opinion, written by Judge Roger L. Kline, overturned each of Goff’s arguments, saying the woman could not prove she was prejudiced against in any of the complaints.

The Tribune believes it is possible for people with a variety of points of view to discuss issues in a civil manner and will remove comments that, in our opinion, foster incivility. We want to encourage an open exchange of information and ideas. Responsibility for what is posted or contributed to this site is the sole responsibility of each user. By contributing to this website, you agree not to post any defamatory, abusive, harassing, obscene, sexual, threatening or illegal material, or any other material that infringes on the ability of others to enjoy this site, or that infringes on the rights of others. Any user who feels that a contribution to this website is a violation of these terms of use is encouraged to email, or click the "report comment" link that is on all comments. We reserve the right to remove messages that violate these terms of use and we will make every effort to do so — within a reasonable time frame — if we determine that removal is necessary.

Editor's Picks

Apple butter on sale to benefit Shop With a Cop

SOUTH POINT — Law enforcement agencies in Lawrence County have kicked off the annual apple butter fundraiser for the Shop With a Cop program. Every year, ... Read more