Archived Story

Ironton water rates to increase in March

Published 9:46am Friday, February 15, 2013

Starting in March, Ironton residents will see a 16-cent increase in their water usage rates.

Ironton City Council voted 6-1 in favor of the 3 percent increase after a presentation by Mayor Rich Blankenship at Thursday’s meeting.

Currently, residents pay $5.30 per thousand gallons of water, Blankenship said, and the last increase in rates was for 30 cents in 2011.

Blankenship compared for council the price of a gallon of city water to gallons of water found in a local store, gas and milk.

Milk was about $4 a gallon and gas is $3.77 per gallon at a city gas station, Blankenship said.

“If you go in and buy a gallon of water it’s $1.90,” he said. “…If you buy 1,000 gallons of (bottled) water, you’re going to pay $1,900. If you buy 1,000 gallons from the City of Ironton, it’s going to cost you $5.30.”

Right now, the cost for one gallon of water is $0.0053. Last year, the city treated 560 million gallons of water.

With the 3 percent increase, residents will pay $5.46 per 1,000 gallons. The ordinance also sets 3 percent increases in January 2014, making the rate $5.63 per thousand gallons and in January 2015, setting it at $5.79.

Blankenship cited rising costs at the water treatment plant as a reason for raising the water usage rates.

“From 2011 to 2012, at the water treatment plant, the chemical costs increased 20.22 percent,” he said. “Electricity costs increased 23.88 percent.”

The mayor also said those expenses don’t take into account the four employees at the water treatment plant and the five in distribution but the rate increase would not go towards salaries.

“This doesn’t even go to their salaries or benefits or anything,” Blankenship said. “This is just to draw the water from the river to get it up on the hill so you can drink it, or take a bath or cook or whatever you may do.”

“What would that translate to in increased revenue for the city?” councilman Philip Heald asked.

City finance director Kristen Martin said the increase would add about $36,000 to the water fund.

“I don’t think 16 cents per thousand gallons is asking too much,” Blankenship said.

Councilman Dave Frazer was the only member who voted against the increase.

After the meeting, he said, “When I ran (for council), I ran on the campaign that I wouldn’t raise any of the rates.”

In response to Frazer’s opposition to the increase, Blankenship said, “What other alternatives has Mr. Frazer submitted to council?”

Council also passed an ordinance to extend the city’s contract for health insurance coverage for its full-time employees through MedBen at a 3 percent increase.

This has been the projected increase the city is using in budget drafts.

Resolutions for the city to apply for Natureworks grant through the Ohio Department of Natural Resources, enter into a contract with the Ironton-Lawrence County Community Action Organization and authorize interim financing from the Ironton Port Authority to fund a portion of riverfront development while grant funds are pending also passed.

The Tribune believes it is possible for people with a variety of points of view to discuss issues in a civil manner and will remove comments that, in our opinion, foster incivility. We want to encourage an open exchange of information and ideas. Responsibility for what is posted or contributed to this site is the sole responsibility of each user. By contributing to this website, you agree not to post any defamatory, abusive, harassing, obscene, sexual, threatening or illegal material, or any other material that infringes on the ability of others to enjoy this site, or that infringes on the rights of others. Any user who feels that a contribution to this website is a violation of these terms of use is encouraged to email, or click the "report comment" link that is on all comments. We reserve the right to remove messages that violate these terms of use and we will make every effort to do so — within a reasonable time frame — if we determine that removal is necessary.

  • bigkahuna

    Flush every third or fourth trip to the john and the cost will be less.

    (Report comment)

  • swimmingupstream

    Mayor Blankenship said:

    “This is just to draw the water from the river to get it up on the hill so you can drink it, or take a bath or cook or whatever you may do.”

    So this would include hot tub hanky-panky???

    (Report comment)

  • citizenkane

    One more time,I will ask the question that seems to never get answered. When the city installed the drive by and read water meters, it allowed one employee to replace the 4 it previously took to walk around town manually reading the meters. The politicians stated then, that this change would pay for itself by doing away with water department employees.To date, the number of employees in water has not been reduced. Why not??????????

    (Report comment)

    • Digi

      Well for one, letting go employees would be messing with the good ole boy system they have going on around here. You have to consider too they are probably getting some extra cash stocked up because you know they smell the 3rd lawsuit coming from a certain counsel person if this grand jury thing and trial doesn’t go the way she wants it to. Ironton politics is just one big JOKE! Face it folks, all people are doing is lining the pockets of the few, that’s why they stop business expansion here, they don’t want to share a single dollar with anyone!

      (Report comment)

  • Digi

    You’re seriously comparing nasty FREE river water to the costs of purified clean water, milk and gas prices? Looks like there is only one person on the council wanting reelected and had sense enough to vote against that crap. Half the time you turn on your faucet and the water comes out discolored and has nasty taste and isn’t drinkable. That’s why people buy bottled water. So now on top of paying an already high water bill and buying drinking water, you are making us pay more for that FREE nasty river water… Yea makes sense to me *rolls eyes sarcastically*

    (Report comment)

Editor's Picks