Archived Story

Lawsuit filed against CAO over assets

Published 10:09am Thursday, March 14, 2013

The impasse between a county cleanup agency and the organization that once managed it is officially heading to court.

On March 8, the Lawrence-Scioto Solid Waste Management District filed a lawsuit against the Ironton-Lawrence County Community Action Organization in common pleas court.

From the 1990s until November the CAO had operated the solid waste district’s program under an approximately $362,000 annual contract. That association began when the district had run into problems with the state Environmental Protection Agency.

When the district’s board, made up of the commissioners from both counties, voted to sever ties with the CAO, the district became an independent agency. Its headquarters are now in Lawrence County and its staff now Scioto County employees with county benefits and state retirement.

Funding for the district comes from the $12 annual fee placed on all improved parcels in both counties. In 2012, total revenue for the district was $640,919.

Among the issues in contention is the ownership of five vehicles the CAO had purchased for the solid waste district for use in its litter and trash cleanup work. In November after the district broke with the CAO, the district was told by the CAO that those vehicles were CAO assets. The district countered that it owned the vehicles since they were paid for from the parcel fee.

Since the district’s staff was no longer CAO employees, the CAO’s insurance policy could no longer cover them, preventing the solid waste district from using the vehicles. At that time solid waste district staff was instructed by director Dan Palmer not to return the vehicles and park them at undisclosed locations.

In the six-count complaint filed by the district’s attorney, Scioto County assistant prosecutor, Danielle Parker, the solid waste district seeks a declaration by the court that the vehicles “belong to and are the property of the plaintiff, the Lawrence-Scioto SWMD.”

The complaint also seeks that the CAO repay to the district any money received in excess of the contract; $230,255 as reimbursement for overpayment made by the district to the CAO “for the time provided and expenses incurred up to the termination date;” $84,134 “as reimbursement for any and all funds paid by the plaintiff for the purchase of the vehicles;” and an injunction stopping the CAO from using the vehicles and from canceling insurance on the vehicles.

Before the lawsuit was filed, Parker and Curt Anderson, the CAO’s lawyer, were beginning to attempt to negotiate a resolution about the ownership issue.

“It is frustrating that you come to a point where there is a lawsuit without having been able to negotiate or sit down and talk with them,” D.R. Gossett, CAO executive director, said.

The Tribune believes it is possible for people with a variety of points of view to discuss issues in a civil manner and will remove comments that, in our opinion, foster incivility. We want to encourage an open exchange of information and ideas. Responsibility for what is posted or contributed to this site is the sole responsibility of each user. By contributing to this website, you agree not to post any defamatory, abusive, harassing, obscene, sexual, threatening or illegal material, or any other material that infringes on the ability of others to enjoy this site, or that infringes on the rights of others. Any user who feels that a contribution to this website is a violation of these terms of use is encouraged to email, or click the "report comment" link that is on all comments. We reserve the right to remove messages that violate these terms of use and we will make every effort to do so — within a reasonable time frame — if we determine that removal is necessary.

  • mikehaney

    Close down the solid waste district and sell the vehicles.
    Put the money in a fund and “award” anyone that catches someone littering, private citizens and also law enforcement.
    Fine the offender(s)/or jail and list names in all three local papers in a special section.
    Some other states don’t seem to have this problem, especially when you can see what it will cost you if caught littering.
    Tired of seeing our tax dollars”thrown out the window”.
    Now we’re paying lawyers?

    (Report comment)

  • swimmingupstream

    CAO: “Those are our mables and you can’t play with them. NaaNanABooBoo!!!!”

    (Report comment)

  • swampcreature

    CAO should simply hand the vehicles over and move on. Mr. Palmer and his crew have a county to clean up.

    (Report comment)

  • chs71

    Mr. Gossett, you have got to be kidding…this has been a problem for quite a while and you are making a statement that “it frustrating”! You are a joke and I hope they get everything they are asking for and more…
    You should be made to resign your position or be fired for representing Lawrence County in the position that you do. You sir are nothing more than a “bully”.

    (Report comment)

Editor's Picks

Local hip-hop artist to perform at SXSW

Ironton High School Class of 2011 graduate McKinley Carter, who goes by the name of Mac Carter, knew at a young age he wanted to ... Read more