Archived Story

If the planes go, what could be next?

Published 11:16am Wednesday, April 17, 2013

CHESAPEAKE — This time next year Lawrence County might possibly not have an airport and for at least one commissioner that reality could be a way to improve the county’s bottom line.

Last week Commission President Bill Pratt sent a letter to Irene Porter, program manager for the Detroit region of the Federal Aviation Administration. Porter is in charge of the grants that the county receives from the federal agency.

“We need to know basically what will happen if Lawrence County no longer has an airport,” Pratt said. “What are the repercussions if Lawrence County doesn’t have a airport as far as paying back grants? There may not be any, but I suspect there is.”

In fact, Pratt puts an estimate on what the county might owe as far as paying back grants at between $600,000 to $800,000.

“That is not a firm figure,” he said.

That money could come from the proceeds of any sale of the land where the airport sits.

In 1936 the land was deeded to the county commission from the North Kenova Holding Co., and C.L. and Mabel Ritter. The county was allowed to use the property as long as it was the site of an airport. Should the county shut down the airport for a period of one year, the property would revert back to the original conveyors.

Richard Wilson, a current heir of the holding company, has long been a vocal opponent of the airport, saying the land is in a prime location and should be developed for commercial use.

Currently the commission is in the middle of an eminent domain lawsuit to acquire 47 additional acres owned by North Kenova but not part of the 78 acres that is the Lawrence County Airport.

The county had wanted to acquire that acreage primarily to cut down trees causing hazards at the ends of the runways.

“We have concerns about the safety of the airport and that is one reason we are involved with the eminent domain lawsuit,” Pratt said.

Another safety issue Pratt discusses in his letter to Porter is the close proximity of the airport to three public schools — Chesapeake middle and high schools and Burlington Elementary School — and the heavily traveled 17th Street Bridge going into Huntington, W.Va.

Despite the lawsuit and a recent grant application for funding to improve runway lighting, the airport could go on the auction block.

“The county is considering marketing the airport for sale,” Pratt said. “We do have an estimated appraisal of $8.5 million. If the property was no longer an airport and some person bought that land and developed it, the county would stand to gain from real estate taxes. If a business came in and sold goods like a Target and Home Depot, the county could stand to gain from sales taxes that the county has missed out on.”

However, if the current airport were sold, that might not mean the county would be out of the airport business, but at a different location in the county.

“That depends on what the FAA says,” Pratt said. “If they see this as a real possibility and were willing to help financially, that could happen, to put in another air field.”

Pratt estimates costs of a new airfield to be in the range of $5 million.

“That’s not going to happen if the county would have to absorb that,” he said. “But a runway that is 10,000 feet. Fedex could land a plane with all cargo and that would benefit Lawrence County.”

The Tribune believes it is possible for people with a variety of points of view to discuss issues in a civil manner and will remove comments that, in our opinion, foster incivility. We want to encourage an open exchange of information and ideas. Responsibility for what is posted or contributed to this site is the sole responsibility of each user. By contributing to this website, you agree not to post any defamatory, abusive, harassing, obscene, sexual, threatening or illegal material, or any other material that infringes on the ability of others to enjoy this site, or that infringes on the rights of others. Any user who feels that a contribution to this website is a violation of these terms of use is encouraged to email, or click the "report comment" link that is on all comments. We reserve the right to remove messages that violate these terms of use and we will make every effort to do so — within a reasonable time frame — if we determine that removal is necessary.

  • Poor Richard

    First of all we have elected officials trying to make decisions about an airport when they don’t know squat about running an airport.

    Second of all, no plane has ever hit a school or bridge.

    Third, the county will NOT benefit from any economic development if it was not an airport because the county gives every frig’in business that comes into this county a free ride. What you will get is massive and I mean massive traffic congestion well beyond what the schools currently create. More lack of planning.

    Fourth, if county officials even think for one second that some of us citizens would support yet another airport you best think again. You want a fight on your hands, a major fight, just try that one! To even consider that much damage to rural land in Lawrence County is just about as stupid as it gets, particularly when you already have a damn airport that no one knows how to manage. Five million dollars – what the he*l is wrong with you people!!

    So, here’s my opinion, either manage the airport you have responsibly and profitably for the citizens of the county or get OUT OF THE AIRPORT BUSINESS altogether – NO MORE AIRPORTS. Personally, I would rather look at grass and weeds than more haphazard development with ugly buildings, stinking parking lots full of trash, and traffic everywhere and Lawrence County is full of haphazard buildings, housing and roadways built with absolutely NO countywide planning in mind.

    Local officials, as I have said in the past, do not ‘plan’ anything, do not have the knowledge and experience to manage a county and most of their ideas they pull out their butt on a ‘wing’ and a prayer.

    If you look at nearly every airport in the Appalachian counties, they are nothing more than a place for locals to store and fly their private planes around their county. If the federal government is providing grant funds to keep these airports open, what exactly is the government’s goal for these small county airports????????

    (Report comment)

  • jimmer

    You can guarantee that even if the other land that may be used isn’t owned/sold by a commissioner they will benefit from its sale.

    (Report comment)

  • Digi

    So in all seriousness, right now how many FEDEX planes land at this airport? I would think they were using the Tri-State Airport since it’s closer to them, just the same as UPS does. Feel free to correct me though as I do not hang out at the airport. I would love to see actual true numbers as to who lands there in Chesie, who rents hangers and who is behind on the rent.

    (Report comment)

    • Digi

      And where is the land that you propose this new airport should go on? And I do hope it’s not owned by another commissioner because that line is really getting old…

      (Report comment)

      • mikehaney

        Good point. Exactly where is this other land and who owns it.
        Since the question was asked, it should be cleared up.

        (Report comment)

      • Digi

        Mr. Haney notices we have no witty sneers at us answering these questions or defending this article?

        (Report comment)

Editor's Picks

Local hip-hop artist to perform at SXSW

Ironton High School Class of 2011 graduate McKinley Carter, who goes by the name of Mac Carter, knew at a young age he wanted to ... Read more