Archived Story

Cartoons not just for laughs

Published 12:11am Sunday, April 21, 2013

Being someone who is captivated by storytelling — this being a big reason why I sought a career in journalism in the first place — it has always sort of frustrated me to hear that a picture is worth a thousand words.

But it is impossible to dismiss the impact of a visual presentation. Photography and graphic design have become ingrained into our society and certainly in newspapers.

So, then how many words does a political cartoon represent? 100? 500? 1,000? 5,000?

It likely depends on the cartoon and the situation, but the power is indisputable.

Illustrations have been a fundamental part of newspaper opinion pages for hundreds of years. The exact purpose of political cartoons can be debated but the impact cannot.

Dr. Paul Parker, a political scientist from Truman State University, sums it up well in the article, “American Political Cartoons: An Introduction.”

“Relying on symbolism and caricature, experimenting in fresh imagery, political cartoons help people think about politics,” he wrote. “Whether their purpose is to promote the status quo, raise social concerns, or to spur people to fight hard for change, political cartoons have changed the face of history.”

Often even more so than editorials that outline The Tribune’s position on key issues, good political cartoons really effect readers.

But, ultimately, that is the point!

Why even run a political cartoon if it doesn’t elicit an emotion or reaction of some sort? That response might be anger. It might be humor. It might be happiness. It might be curiosity. Or anything in between.

Most important, political cartoons should simply make readers think.

By design, these cartoons are often over-the-top caricatures of important issues and current events. How boring would it be if we agreed with every view or idea presented?

I can unequivocally say that I put cartoons and commentary that I disagree with on the opinion page almost daily. But these cause me to challenge my own ideas and beliefs by thinking about other viewpoints.

And it is OK if a cartoon creates strong feelings. Remember, unlike the Sunday funnies, these cartoons are intended for more than just laughs.

 

Michael Caldwell is publisher of The Tribune. To reach him, call (740) 532-1445 ext. 24 or by e-mail at mike.caldwell@irontontribune.com. Follow him on Twitter: @MikeCaldwell_IT.

The Tribune believes it is possible for people with a variety of points of view to discuss issues in a civil manner and will remove comments that, in our opinion, foster incivility. We want to encourage an open exchange of information and ideas. Responsibility for what is posted or contributed to this site is the sole responsibility of each user. By contributing to this website, you agree not to post any defamatory, abusive, harassing, obscene, sexual, threatening or illegal material, or any other material that infringes on the ability of others to enjoy this site, or that infringes on the rights of others. Any user who feels that a contribution to this website is a violation of these terms of use is encouraged to email report-comments@irontontribune.com, or click the "report comment" link that is on all comments. We reserve the right to remove messages that violate these terms of use and we will make every effort to do so — within a reasonable time frame — if we determine that removal is necessary.

  • mickakers

    Michael Caldwell; An excellent article. And by the way, the “Sunday funnies” are also “intended for more than just laughs.” Artwork, in particular Religious artwork goes back many centuries before the common man or woman could read or write being able to convey to the general populace an opinion or belief. Artwork in all it’s presentations is indispensable for the betterment of man. This being said, there is a distinction between artwork and vulgar trite disguised as artwork.

    (Report comment)

Editor's Picks