Archived Story

Eminent domain trial postponed

Published 10:07am Thursday, June 27, 2013

The trial in the eminent domain case of the Lawrence County Commission over acreage it wants at the Lawrence County Airport has been postponed.

Originally, the case was to go before a jury in August.

“Basically we are rescheduling to do some mediation,” Richard Meyers, attorney for the commissioners, said. “It is too early to go to trial. We will discuss settlement.”

In 2012 the commission filed a petition seeking to acquire 47 acres at either end of the runways. The property is owned by North Kenova Holdings LLC and North Kenova Development Co. Inc.

The parties are at odds as far as the value of the acreage. The commission has offered $280,000. The owners say the land is worth $1.8 million.

On Jan. 20, 2011, the county commission passed a resolution stating there was a public need to expand the airport to comply with Federal Aviation Administration regulations including maintaining runway safety and keeping the air space clear.

The property is part of acreage owned by the Wilson family, who deeded the adjacent land to the county in the 1930s on the condition that it be the site of a county airport. At any time the county wants to close the airport the land reverts back to the Wilson family, according to a clause in that deed.

Both Richard Wilson, whose family owns the North Kenova companies, and Commission President Bill Pratt have publicly pushed to shut down the airport and commercially develop the entire acreage. However, recently the FAA has said since the county used federal grants for upgrades at the site that now obligates the county to keep the land as an airport.

A case management conference is scheduled for Oct. 16.

“We have to report in early October to the judge on the status of the case,” Meyers said.

The Tribune believes it is possible for people with a variety of points of view to discuss issues in a civil manner and will remove comments that, in our opinion, foster incivility. We want to encourage an open exchange of information and ideas. Responsibility for what is posted or contributed to this site is the sole responsibility of each user. By contributing to this website, you agree not to post any defamatory, abusive, harassing, obscene, sexual, threatening or illegal material, or any other material that infringes on the ability of others to enjoy this site, or that infringes on the rights of others. Any user who feels that a contribution to this website is a violation of these terms of use is encouraged to email, or click the "report comment" link that is on all comments. We reserve the right to remove messages that violate these terms of use and we will make every effort to do so — within a reasonable time frame — if we determine that removal is necessary.

  • mickakers

    The right of Eminent domain leaves a bad taste in my mouth. Often times the owners of the land are not justly compensated. Please do a search on eminent domain, Wikipedia has a decent article. Caution is in order when invoking the right of Eminent domain. The Railroad Industry is well known for the abuse of this act.

    (Report comment)

Editor's Picks

Local hip-hop artist to perform at SXSW

Ironton High School Class of 2011 graduate McKinley Carter, who goes by the name of Mac Carter, knew at a young age he wanted to ... Read more