Archived Story

‘Living Wage’ would be good for nation

Published 12:00am Sunday, July 21, 2013

The concept of the “Living Wage” came about in America in 1994 in urban planning and has spread to several cities and localities over the past two plus decades, but remains an idea far from universal acceptance.

This week the issue came back into the news in Washington D.C., where Walmart, the retailer liberals love to hate, is constructing its first three stores with plans for three additional stores.

The city council in the District passed a bill waiting for the mayor’s signature, a mayor who remains uncommitted to signing the bill as of this date. The bill would require retailers with stores exceeding 70,000 square feet in interior dimensions and annual corporate sales of over $1 billion to pay employees a living wage. That wage, as defined in the bill, would be $12.50 per hour, about 50 percent more than the minimum wage established in D.C.

Walmart has responded to the bill by suggesting it may consider cancelling the three stores under construction and not building any stores in the District of Columbia if the district is determined to pursue such anti-business policies. Walmart points out that the bill as written seems designed specifically to punish it and allow other, local or smaller competitors, to avoid equal pay to workers.

Others who support the Walmart position argue that living wage requirements harm employment, raise prices, and restrict growth, arguments frankly rolled out when any social burden is suggested for business.

Advocates for the living wage cite several studies where the living wage has been implemented that suggest that none of the concerns noted by those objecting have occurred where the living wage has become policy.

Further, the advantage of establishing a living wage offers benefits that help communities served like providing more purchasing power to workers, raising workers from poverty levels, and reducing turnover.

In news of just bad timing this week another big retailer, McDonald’s published a worker budget tool for managing personal expenses. Unfortunately the budget included a second job to allow an individual to make a living that would pay for food, housing and minimal insurance coverage, thus suggesting McDonald’s is certainly not providing anything approaching a living wage.

The truth is Walmart, McDonald’s, and many other national chains do not pay employees enough to keep their workers from costing taxpayers for the workers to be employed by the retailers.

All too often these employees earnings fall below the poverty level, making them eligible for Medicaid and food stamps and housing support as a burden to the taxpayer. So while Wal-Mart and McDonalds distribute profits to shareholders, taxpayers hold the burden of providing their employees benefits the companies could, and perhaps should, pay for themselves.

The same companies demand endless economic development subsidies when opening their stores in communities including, but not limited to, tax abatements, job training grants, reduced land prices and property tax reductions.

These stimulus benefits reduce schools funding, transfer road and infrastructure costs to taxpayers, in addition to transferring health care costs and supplemental poverty benefits to society.

Walmart, as an example, as of 2010 has 1,100 stores in the U.S. receiving economic development assistance totaling more than $1 billion dollars.

If the system is “free enterprise,” why it is free to the retailer but costly to the taxpayer? Why is free enterprise dependent upon everyone else paying their costs of development and employment?

The living wage is not a perfect solution until it applies to all workers in all jobs, but it is a far better idea than taxpayers carrying the real costs of highly profitable corporations. And the living wage established would help the economy and increase consumer spending.

Let Walmart threaten to not open because they are unwilling to pay the true costs of doing business. After the hand wringing is done count on the stores opening.

 

Jim Crawford is a retired educator and political enthusiast living here in the Tri-State.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • keta

    Why is it when the subject of living wages comes up, republicans offer the most reasons why its such a bad idea?
    ———————————————————-

    One word – habit. They’ve been using those same reasons for about 70 years. They represent the people who depend on low-wage workers to keep their businesses afloat. Those low-wage jobs can’t be shipped overseas, so industries like retailers and restaurants lobby hard to keep wages as miniscule as possible. They’re lying, of course. A lot of cities have given up on congress and raised the minimum wage themselves, and guess what – low wage workers spend everything they make, in their own communities. Businesses thrive when the income gap narrows, and, happily, taxpayers don’t have to subsidize workers who are earning a living wage. Of course, Sam Walton’s heirs might lose their spots on the Top Ten Wealthiest Americans list, but I doubt if they’d suffer much. Shareholders might earn a little less, CEOs might have to settle for just 200 times what they average employee makes, instead of 400, 600, or 800 times that amount, but they’d be OK, too.

    (Report comment)

  • Geronimo

    Why is it when the subject of living wages comes up , republicans offer the most reasons why its such a bad Idea? And health care for those who can’t afford it is a terrible idea. But when it comes to cutting taxes for Billionaires , its brilliant economics. Oh! and mikehaney , check that retirement thing in Detroit. The regular old garbage man is not quite that much. It being atop heavy plan the biggest % goes to the top execs. At least that’s the way I heard it , and I don’t know anymore about it than you. Just to pass on.

    (Report comment)

    • http://www.tytandan.com 79Tiger

      Please explain to me, Geronimo, how legislating wage is a good thing and how it creates jobs.

      (Report comment)

  • keta

    Reliable cars are so easy to make nowadays – EVERYBODY’S doing it. Detroit needs new manufacturing jobs, like every other city in America.

    (Report comment)

  • mikehaney

    As far as Detroit government employees retirement. Pretty sure I heard on news of $2900.00/mo. Just to pass on.

    (Report comment)

  • http://www.tytandan.com 79Tiger

    If legislating “living wages” is such a good idea, why not make it $25.00 an hour? How about $50.00? That would make things twice as good.

    Mike Haney: I believe I sent you a message on FB unless that wasn’t you.

    (Report comment)

    • mikehaney

      79 Tiger, nope. Someone named Mike Haney is scratching his head possibly.

      (Report comment)

  • mikehaney

    Last Thursday in Detroit, 60 consecutive years of progressive Democratic governance, in collaboration with rapacious government employee unions, produced an inevitable conclusion: the largest municipal bankruptcy in the history of the nation.

    (Report comment)

  • mickakers

    Jim Crawford; A perceptive and informative article. Thank you.

    (Report comment)

Editor's Picks

Fundraiser set for Coal Grove teen

COAL GROVE — A community-wide effort to win Devyn Pritchard a wheelchair accessible van from a National Mobility Equipment Dealers Association contest fell short earlier ... Read more

Special needs camp teaches bike-riding

HUNTINGTON, W.Va. — The father didn’t want anyone to see, so he tried to casually brush them away. But the tears that welled in his ... Read more

Antique equipment shows off history

Ohio lies in a unique position within the United States, with part of the state situated in the Mid-West and the southeastern portion of the ... Read more

Unexpected heroes

Passersby help people trapped in burning house   Heroes don’t always wear capes, uniforms or badges. They aren’t always scanning the skies, or roaming alleyways ... Read more