Archived Story

Enforcement key for all laws

Published 12:51am Sunday, August 25, 2013

There I was, driving down Sixth Street in Ironton last week. I was paying close attention to every intersection to ensure drivers on perpendicular streets actually obeyed the big red signs that say “STOP,” which anyone who has driven through the city knows is sometimes a rarity.

I was shocked when a small golf cart zipped out in front of me like it was carrying Tiger Woods to the 18th hole of The Masters on a championship Sunday. Because I had been on the lookout, with some squealing brakes and burnt rubber, everything was okay.

What if we hadn’t been so lucky?

Then I asked myself, “Wait a second, did city council already pass that law?”

After doing a little research and asking around, I learned two interesting things.

First, the city has not yet approved the use of golf carts on city streets but some citizens feel comfortable enough that there are not any consequences for breaking the law that they hit the roads anyway.

Second, I found out that I am not alone in this near-crash experience.

So why would the city even bother to consider new laws if the existing ones aren’t going to be enforced?

It doesn’t matter if an individual agrees with a law or not. They are in place for a reason and we have a responsibility, as good citizens, to obey the laws on the books.

And it is up to the police to enforce all of them, too. An officer’s opinion on a particular law or who the individual breaking it is should be irrelevant.

The concept of allowing golf carts on Ironton’s streets is simply a bad idea at this time. The minimal benefits and tourism marketability are far surpassed by safety concerns and unanswered questions.

The bottom line is that even a street-legal golf cart doesn’t offer near the protection as that of a motor vehicle. What would be a minor crash between two cars could be fatal if it involved a cart.

Those who argue that carts are safer than motorcycles fail to acknowledge that the difference is maneuverability and speed, as well as years of data about the impact of motorcycle crashes.

Years of minimal traffic enforcement — for some legitimate reasons that include a lack of manpower and higher priorities, as well unjustifiable ones like pure apathy and political pressures — have created dangerous habits.

Far too many motorists in Ironton treat stop signs as optional. Red lights are more like suggestions than mandates. Speed limits are just numbers to laugh at as someone speeds by in a blur.

Until this is addressed, it would be irresponsible and downright dangerous to put less visible and less safe vehicles on the road.

City council should vote down the current proposal for golf carts but not close the book on the concept.

If the city is serious about this plan it should develop a comprehensive plan that would address safety and answer the many questions surrounding the issue.

How many people are interested in driving golf carts here? What would they use them for? What would it do to traffic flow on Park Avenue or Second Street? How have other cities handled golf carts? What level of enforcement would there be to ensure drivers are licensed and in vehicles that are street legal? Are there certain routes that could be used to minimize the impact?

City leaders should look at every option to bring people into Ironton and create a unique niche here in southern Ohio. Golf carts may be a part of that future after the issue is thoroughly researched to determine the pros and cons.

For now, citizens need to remember that these vehicles are illegal and have no place on the roads.


Michael Caldwell is publisher of The Tribune. To reach him, call (740) 532-1445 ext. 24 or by e-mail at Follow him on Twitter: @MikeCaldwell_IT.

The Tribune believes it is possible for people with a variety of points of view to discuss issues in a civil manner and will remove comments that, in our opinion, foster incivility. We want to encourage an open exchange of information and ideas. Responsibility for what is posted or contributed to this site is the sole responsibility of each user. By contributing to this website, you agree not to post any defamatory, abusive, harassing, obscene, sexual, threatening or illegal material, or any other material that infringes on the ability of others to enjoy this site, or that infringes on the rights of others. Any user who feels that a contribution to this website is a violation of these terms of use is encouraged to email, or click the "report comment" link that is on all comments. We reserve the right to remove messages that violate these terms of use and we will make every effort to do so — within a reasonable time frame — if we determine that removal is necessary.

  • Digi

    You have hit that proverbial nail on the head! But I’m afraid as usual with the city it’s not the voice of reason, common sense or even the majority that comes out ahead on these silly decisions! I have a feeling this is one they will pass fr thier buddies just to prove they can. And when the first accident happens, I hope the city gets sued for allowing the carts in the street!

    (Report comment)

  • Luger

    Mike, you are right about this issue. I now live in a town that allows “street legal” golf carts. Over the years, the street legal requirements are no longer being enforced for many reasons. It is not uncommon to see a cart without any lights or turn signals. The police have too many other responsibilities to be fooling with these golf carts. I will guess that on the Memorial Day weekend you will see plenty of underage drivers zooming around neighborhoods. To believe there will be dozens of $4500 street legal golf carts roaming the city is a stretch.

    Golf carts are FUN!!! That is the point of wanting to drive them around town and that is the only reason to accept them. Any arguments of attracting tourists or retirees is insane.

    Unlike Ironton, where I live, there are plenty of bike lanes to help keep the drivers out of the traffic.

    (Report comment)

  • swampcreature

    Thanks you Mike Caldwell for telling it just like it is in this city.

    Hopefully, city council will reject this foolish idea before a needless tragedy takes place. Ironton has no golf courses inside its city limits. There is no reason to toss golf carts onto our already dangerous city streets,

    Allowing golf carts on Business 52 (2nd Street) with its overpass, truck traffic and 35 m.p.h. speed limit has to be the most ludicrous idea ever proposed in the history of this city. If this actually passes, city council should probably require pre-paid funeral plans for those stupid enough to want to ride around Ironton in a vehicle intended for golf courses.

    And why not legalize four-wheelers too? Where will this city council draw the line?

    (Report comment)

  • tiggeroo

    WELL STATED! This cuts to the core of the matter. Our traffic laws are not enforced now, for reasone I don’t understand. However, I do not feel that we are understaffed in police patrol. Now is not the time to allow golf carts to roam our streets for the very reasons you state in this article.
    A neighbor in the next block allows grandkids to go up and down the alley in a golf cart, sometimes turning around in the side street. I’m afraid of a disasterous result even with this.

    (Report comment)

Editor's Picks

Apple butter on sale to benefit Shop With a Cop

SOUTH POINT — Law enforcement agencies in Lawrence County have kicked off the annual apple butter fundraiser for the Shop With a Cop program. Every year, ... Read more