Archived Story

Shooting created emotional debate

Published 10:21am Thursday, November 21, 2013

The recent shooting in Coal Grove was, I’m sure we all agree, a tragic event.

A man deemed it necessary to shoot to protect his property, and possibly himself. A young man almost died. This event has created a rather emotional debate locally.

I do not wish to take part in that discussion because I cannot know what I would do in such a situation. However, I do know that there are many lazy and/or drug addicted people in this area who would take all that I have worked for if they could.

And some of them would be willing to harm me and my family in doing so.

That fact places me in a somewhat paradoxical situation, which I believe, is shared by many others. I do not want to hurt anyone; yet my .38 special is loaded with hollow points.

Did the shooter use excessive force? Or did he have every right to shoot? That is the focus of the debate. I can understand both sides of that discussion.

But in order to keep the discussion fair and honest, one truth must never be ignored. The victim shot the criminal.


Greg Hunter



The Tribune believes it is possible for people with a variety of points of view to discuss issues in a civil manner and will remove comments that, in our opinion, foster incivility. We want to encourage an open exchange of information and ideas. Responsibility for what is posted or contributed to this site is the sole responsibility of each user. By contributing to this website, you agree not to post any defamatory, abusive, harassing, obscene, sexual, threatening or illegal material, or any other material that infringes on the ability of others to enjoy this site, or that infringes on the rights of others. Any user who feels that a contribution to this website is a violation of these terms of use is encouraged to email, or click the "report comment" link that is on all comments. We reserve the right to remove messages that violate these terms of use and we will make every effort to do so — within a reasonable time frame — if we determine that removal is necessary.

  • Ozzy

    In a lot of communities the police would have tried to go after the shooter in situations like this. I am glad that we have a Sheriff that is looking out for home owners that are protecting themselves.
    Thank you Sheriff!
    The Second Amendment worked in this situation.

    (Report comment)

  • mikehaney

    Greg–The victim shot the criminal.
    When the criminal puts a stranger in a threatening situation,anything can happen. Most victims don’t have the experience and training to handle a situation properly brought on by the criminal, especially physically threatening situations.

    (Report comment)

Editor's Picks

Tackling addiction

Spectrum Outreach plans recovery housing for addicts   The Ohio Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services on Nov. 10 announced a $10 million investment ... Read more