Archived Story

Policy killing initiative

Published 10:22am Tuesday, February 11, 2014

Get this: The government is incentivizing people to not work.

So said the head of the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office last week. CBO Director Douglas Elmendorf told lawmakers that millions of workers could either cut back their work hours or opt out of the job market completely because of ObamaCare.

The CBO report says millions of people will opt to keep their income low to stay eligible for federal health-care subsidies or Medicaid — resulting in losses equivalent to 2.3 million full-time jobs by 2021.

But who can blame them?

Working is no fun. I’ve been doing it a long time now and that has been my conclusion. Every Sunday night I get the blues about the stresses and projects that are due that week.

Every Monday, after I wake, stay out of my way until I’ve had a few cups of coffee — and until about 11 a.m., when I finally have some idea of what I have to complete that week.

Of course, I am a writer. My job is easy compared to many others. I don’t have to work outside in the brutal cold every winter, as my father had to do for many years. I don’t even have to sit in traffic for hours, as millions of working Americans must do.

Besides, if you have a modest middle-class income, you have a choice.

Hunker down, grow your talents and skills and do what many millions of Americans have always done: get promoted. Or start a business. Or do a million other things to increase your income over time to live the American dream.

Or you can go the other direction and find ways to avoid work and minimize your income on paper, so that others will help cover your costs.

I took a cab from the airport recently and the driver, a native of Africa, told me he’d just signed up for ObamaCare and qualified for sizable subsidies. His monthly payment is only a few hundred bucks — whereas my health-insurance payment recently doubled, in part to subsidize his insurance policy.

He also told me he has a nice suburban home and he and his family are living very well in Pittsburgh.

So how did he qualify for such grand government subsidies? Because he is able to keep a sizable portion of his actual income, which is paid in cash daily, off the books. He appears much less well-off on his tax return than he is.

The trouble is, the less money he reports in income, the less our government receives in badly needed tax revenues to, ironically, pay his subsidies and whatever other government benefits he is taking advantage of.

There is a reason we still are bringing in at least $500 billion less than we are spending every year.

Now the CBO tells us our newest entitlement is going to cause millions of others to aspire to use the system to their advantage — to qualify for free food, health insurance, housing subsidies, free utilities and on and on.

It wasn’t so long ago that people came to America asking for nothing more than the freedom to make their own way. They wanted to live the American dream and work hard so their children could enjoy an even better American experience.

How did we arrive at a point where government policy is discouraging these aspirations on such a grand scale?

How did we get to a point where millions of people would rather call it a day and happily accept government benefits than work hard to improve their skills and rise into the highest levels of the middle class and beyond?

Sounds like bad government policy to me — policy that is helping put nails in the coffin of the American dream.

 

Tom Purcell is a Pittsburgh Tribune-Review humor columnist and is nationally syndicated exclusively by Cagle Cartoons Inc. Send comments to Tom at Purcell@caglecartoons.com.

Get this: The government is incentivizing people to not work.

So said the head of the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office last week. CBO Director Douglas Elmendorf told lawmakers that millions of workers could either cut back their work hours or opt out of the job market completely because of ObamaCare.

The CBO report says millions of people will opt to keep their income low to stay eligible for federal health-care subsidies or Medicaid — resulting in losses equivalent to 2.3 million full-time jobs by 2021.

But who can blame them?

Working is no fun. I’ve been doing it a long time now and that has been my conclusion. Every Sunday night I get the blues about the stresses and projects that are due that week.

Every Monday, after I wake, stay out of my way until I’ve had a few cups of coffee — and until about 11 a.m., when I finally have some idea of what I have to complete that week.

Of course, I am a writer. My job is easy compared to many others. I don’t have to work outside in the brutal cold every winter, as my father had to do for many years. I don’t even have to sit in traffic for hours, as millions of working Americans must do.

Besides, if you have a modest middle-class income, you have a choice.

Hunker down, grow your talents and skills and do what many millions of Americans have always done: get promoted. Or start a business. Or do a million other things to increase your income over time to live the American dream.

Or you can go the other direction and find ways to avoid work and minimize your income on paper, so that others will help cover your costs.

I took a cab from the airport recently and the driver, a native of Africa, told me he’d just signed up for ObamaCare and qualified for sizable subsidies. His monthly payment is only a few hundred bucks — whereas my health-insurance payment recently doubled, in part to subsidize his insurance policy.

He also told me he has a nice suburban home and he and his family are living very well in Pittsburgh.

So how did he qualify for such grand government subsidies? Because he is able to keep a sizable portion of his actual income, which is paid in cash daily, off the books. He appears much less well-off on his tax return than he is.

The trouble is, the less money he reports in income, the less our government receives in badly needed tax revenues to, ironically, pay his subsidies and whatever other government benefits he is taking advantage of.

There is a reason we still are bringing in at least $500 billion less than we are spending every year.

Now the CBO tells us our newest entitlement is going to cause millions of others to aspire to use the system to their advantage — to qualify for free food, health insurance, housing subsidies, free utilities and on and on.

It wasn’t so long ago that people came to America asking for nothing more than the freedom to make their own way. They wanted to live the American dream and work hard so their children could enjoy an even better American experience.

How did we arrive at a point where government policy is discouraging these aspirations on such a grand scale?

How did we get to a point where millions of people would rather call it a day and happily accept government benefits than work hard to improve their skills and rise into the highest levels of the middle class and beyond?

Sounds like bad government policy to me — policy that is helping put nails in the coffin of the American dream.

 

Tom Purcell is a Pittsburgh Tribune-Review humor columnist and is nationally syndicated exclusively by Cagle Cartoons Inc. Send comments to Tom at Purcell@caglecartoons.com.

 

The Tribune believes it is possible for people with a variety of points of view to discuss issues in a civil manner and will remove comments that, in our opinion, foster incivility. We want to encourage an open exchange of information and ideas. Responsibility for what is posted or contributed to this site is the sole responsibility of each user. By contributing to this website, you agree not to post any defamatory, abusive, harassing, obscene, sexual, threatening or illegal material, or any other material that infringes on the ability of others to enjoy this site, or that infringes on the rights of others. Any user who feels that a contribution to this website is a violation of these terms of use is encouraged to email report-comments@irontontribune.com, or click the "report comment" link that is on all comments. We reserve the right to remove messages that violate these terms of use and we will make every effort to do so — within a reasonable time frame — if we determine that removal is necessary.

  • keta

    I found your article a bit shortsighted
    ———————————————————–

    Well, that’s a nice way to put it. There’s nothing humorous about being a liar. The people pushing this know it isn’t true; I think Mr. Purcell believes it. “Incentivizing” people not to work? Sure, if you’re past retirement age and still working because you can’t afford insurance on a retiree’s income. Or if you’re a mom with four kids and need to stay home, but your job, not your husband’s, is the one that comes with health insurance. I guess you could say that, technically, these people are being incentivized not to work. But it’s dishonest to pretend that health insurance doesn’t have millions of Americans doing things they don’t enjoy and wouldn’t need to do – if it weren’t for the cost of health insurance. That’s the whole idea behind the ACA, duh.

    (Report comment)

  • mickakers

    Tom Purcell; I found your article a bit short sighted, lacking in depth. However, I did enjoy the humor in it. If I may suggest, give some serious thought to low wages for existing jobs, high prices, lack of jobs paying a living wage and greed, to begin with. The wealthy and very wealthy are doing rather well. The difference between the have’s and have-nots keeps widening.

    (Report comment)

Editor's Picks

Finding the money: Boggs wants ideas on how to pay for new jail

Coming up with a specified way to fund building a county jail is the next step in the process, according to jail committee chair Les ... Read more

Feds will prosecute former officers

With three former Lawrence County corrections officers under federal indictment, the county won’t proceed with its case against them. “The charges we filed were similar ... Read more