Archived Story

Saving workforce means overhaul

Published 11:07am Friday, May 23, 2014

Listen to the rhetoric of Republicans and Democrats alike on the topic of jobs and you will hear both saying they would create jobs but the other party won’t let them.

But as this election year is underway Congress largely admits there will not be much legislation written the rest of the year. Not that we would notice, since no one can recall the last meaningful legislation passed since the Republicans took control of the House in 2010. Divided government has given us ineffective government as its byproduct.

Republicans have 40 bills to create jobs if you accept that job creation is identical with tax cuts for business and the end of regulations for health and safety.

Democrats have bills waiting if job creation is identical to federal funding of infrastructure and subsidies to favored industry sectors.

Neither of their favorite proposals offers much in the way of living wage jobs to replace the 6 million manufacturing jobs lost between 2000 and 2009.

The truth is those well paid manufacturing jobs are not returning to the U.S in any significant numbers, n.ot now and maybe never. And where companies once shared increases in productivity with workers that is no longer the working model. Worker’s wages and benefits stagnant and corporate profits increase with productivity improvement.

The real trend in America is toward increased automation of manufacturing and added efficiency through technology in white collar jobs. Not only is the meter reader obsolete, but so too is the bookkeeper and soon the hotel counter person. All lost to technology and efficiency.

The U.S. now ranks with Britain and France as the lowest percentage of developed nations with manufacturing jobs, at 12 percent of our workforce. In 1953 the US had 28 percent of its workforce in manufacturing jobs.

Consider the new industry of Advanced Manufacturing and its potential. The first such Institute has opened in Youngstown, Ohio and the outcome may end the die casting industry entirely while creating a smaller number of high skilled computer aided design (CAD) jobs.

These changes are irreversible and their impact on our economy will be the continual sluggish job creation that has been the hallmark of the past decade.

And in addition our labor force will be both more and more overqualified and more and more underqualified. Fifteen percent of cab drivers in America have college degrees, while we struggle to fill technology jobs and need to hire from outside the U.S. to continue to grow new technology careers.

The solutions lie in areas the politicians seem to offer little in rhetoric and less in substance.

We must significantly improve the kinds of skills training that reflect the new economy. That means more and more capable math and science grads; more Americans with high level computer skills; more medical practitioners at all levels; and more educators. To accomplish this we must revitalize our technical schools and re-invent their purposes to better match developing career fields.

We will also need to change service jobs from work that taxpayers subsidize to living wage jobs for workers who do not have the kinds of skills to fit more technical jobs.

And we need to strongly commit to investing as a society in research and technology, for our ability to maintain an economic edge will require continual development of products to sell the world.

We urgently need to fix our loophole-ridden corporate tax structure.

Finally, we must invest in our infrastructure if we are to succeed in attracting the premier business and industry companies to the world’s largest consumer market.

As for wages, there will always be another China, another lower wage environment where we cannot and should not compete for lower wages.

We need those we elect to solve problems, not create them.

 

Jim Crawford is a retired educator and political enthusiast living here in the Tri-State.

The Tribune believes it is possible for people with a variety of points of view to discuss issues in a civil manner and will remove comments that, in our opinion, foster incivility. We want to encourage an open exchange of information and ideas. Responsibility for what is posted or contributed to this site is the sole responsibility of each user. By contributing to this website, you agree not to post any defamatory, abusive, harassing, obscene, sexual, threatening or illegal material, or any other material that infringes on the ability of others to enjoy this site, or that infringes on the rights of others. Any user who feels that a contribution to this website is a violation of these terms of use is encouraged to email report-comments@irontontribune.com, or click the "report comment" link that is on all comments. We reserve the right to remove messages that violate these terms of use and we will make every effort to do so — within a reasonable time frame — if we determine that removal is necessary.

  • mickakers

    You got me started Jim; The reality of the situation is; Our benevolent (term loosely used) corporate leaders can get employees (for technological purposes)imported from India at much cheaper wages than blue bloods. The primary problem is, you can’t understand them when you need assistance, I experienced this on many occasions. I had a friend at work from Turkey (Istanbul) I used to tease him and tell him that the actual name of his home town was Byzantium or in later years Constantinople and his ignorance amazed me. The cultural difference is there but also the basic similarities of life.

    (Report comment)

  • mickakers

    Whew!! A lotta ground you are covering here Jim. Interestingly, with the advancement of automation (technology) I have noticed a decline in the quality of service (care and concern) in all aspects of everyday life. A machine (automation) cannot and will never replace the human ingredient (thinking and feeling) this is irreplaceable as demonstrated by the present condition of so called modern and advanced society. When it comes to corporations sharing their increased profits, in the vast majority of cases this was never done on a voluntary basis. Thanks to the efforts of Labor Unions the fruit of increased productivity was begrudgingly shared with the workers. If not for the efforts of Labor Unions, we would have no Middle Class. The younger generation (and many seniors) fail to recognize this fact. Due to the Human Condition, Labor Unions are just as important today as in times past for the survival of the Middle Class. I have been a proud Labor Union member and leader since 1961 and I will continue to be so until my death and maybe even hereafter.

    (Report comment)

Editor's Picks

Chris Smith honored for work in recycling

This year’s Kudos for Caring award from the Lawrence-Scioto Solid Waste Management District went to Chris Smith of South Point. “Each year we recognize an ... Read more