Print this story | E-mail story | This story has 1 comment Add your own | iPod friendly
photo by Jessica St. James
Ironton City Council member Leo Johnson addresses the Lawrence County Commission during its meeting Thursday at the Ironton City Center.
City, county revisit issue of combining 911 service
Officials discuss it as cost cutting measure
Published Friday, September 5, 2008
Ironton Ironton and Lawrence County leaders agreed Thursday night to pursue merging the county’s three emergency services dispatch systems in an effort to save both the county and the city money.
The commission met at the Ironton City Center in council chambers and council member Leo Johnson took the opportunity to ask the commission to step up efforts to put words into action on the issue of combining dispatching for the city police, sheriff’s office and 911 center, which right now handles fire and ambulance calls. Merging the three dispatch centers has been talked about off and on over the last several years.
About two years ago, both Lawrence County Commissioner Jason Stephens and Sheriff Tim Sexton presented the commission with plans to merge the county’s two systems. At that time, a committee consisting of Ironton Police Chief Jim Carey, 911 Director Lonnie Best and Sheriff’s Office Chief Deputy Jeff Lawless. But since then, no action has been taken.
Johnson said both the city and the county might save money by working together.
“Keep it on the front burner, that’s all I’m asking,” Johnson said.
He and Mayor Rich Blankenship pointed out that the city will soon start working on a new budget for the coming year and $250,000 spent on its four fulltime and one part-time dispatching center could be used elsewhere.
Lawrence County Commissioner Jason Stephens said right now the county spends $475,000 on its 911 center. Sheriff’s Office Chief Deputy Jeff Lawless said the sheriff’s office has five dispatchers, at an approximate cost of $200,000 a year.
Stephens pointed out that dispatchers actually perform more than just dispatching duties. Women dispatchers in particular are also clerks and jail matrons. Best pointed out that his dispatchers also have addressing duties.
“Too bad when this thing was set up, it was not done right,” Best said.
Like some of the others, Best said he did not think anyone would lose his job under the merger.
Carey said dispatching for law enforcement is a “totally different world” than handling calls for fire and ambulance. Dispatchers must have access to and training on the Law Enforcement Automatic Data System (LEADS) which must be manned 24 hours a day. Right now, 911 dispatchers do not have access to LEADS while the other two entities do. LEADS is required by law for law enforcement dispatchers.
Carey also pointed out that if, for instance, he simply handed all his police calls to 911, Best would immediately need a lot more dispatchers.
“We have had 700 calls this month alone,” Carey said. He estimated before the year ends, his dispatchers will handle anywhere from 20,000 to 25,000 calls from the public needing help.
Commissioner Tanner Heaberlin’s eye was on finances. Much of the discussion about merging services occurred before he was appointed to the commission last summer.
“How much is this going to cost?” he asked. “Will you need extra equipment?”
Johnson wants a gradual shift from the existing set-up to a completely unified center within, perhaps, three years. He said while the idea may not be popular, the benefits of cost savings and cutting redundancy have long-term value.
“I think Ironton is more than willing to help,” Johnson said. “It’s going to be painful, but leadership is painful.”

Comments
Posted by expletive_deleted (anonymous) on September 13, 2008 at 10:01 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I can't believe something really tragic hasn't already happened. This 911 "answering service" for most county services is a dangerous joke.
Here's one I can't understand, and two previous commissioners couldn't either. About SEOEMS: We own the equipment and the stations.
SEOEMS makes a run. Typically Medicaid gets billed. Or Medicare. Or private insurance. Then WHY in the name of *** are we also paying for a levy?
Those of you who have been billed by SEOEMS know what they charge. They should be making money hands over fist. I think that while we're looking at consolidating 911, we should also take another look at bringing SEOEMS in-house.
Don't get me wrong. I think the SEOEMS employees are great. I wouldn't want to see any of them laid off, or suffer any pay cut. But we've got a money-maker and that money should stay in the county, not sent to SEOEMS HQ.
Our commissioners would be wise to get city support for both these changes. Until these changes and MORE occur there'll never be another county-wide levy passed.
Speaking of cutting costs...the Board of Elections needs to hire an experienced manager for that office. These Mickey Mouse administrators don't know their elbow from a hanging chad. Yes, the process is changing (most of us don't churn our own butter anymore, either). But if its too much for them, or they don't understand the meaning of B-U-D-G-E-T, they should resign and make room for fresh blood. That especially includes the Directors.
Post a comment (Terms of Use Policy)
(Requires free registration.)