Print this story | E-mail story | This story has 13 comments Add your own | iPod friendly | Bookmark this Facebook bookmark del.icio.us bookmark StumbleUpon bookmark Digg bookmark What is this?

A Risky Choice

Canceling insurance may cost consumers more in long run

Published Sunday, July 5, 2009

IRONTON — Matt Thompson had a gut feeling. It was the sensation a person gets when their head and heart are separately torn. It was like he knew.

Thompson had been furloughed from his job as a laborer and money was not going to be coming in regularly. So on a chilly Friday night in March, he sat down at his dining room table, pulled out a pen and calculator and for the first time in his life put together a monthly budget.

“I drew the line right there and told myself I wasn’t going to spend a single nickel more than I had coming in,” said Thompson, who is single. “I really didn’t have much saved up, so I needed to budget smart and trim where I could.”

Some cuts were easy.

The Ironton resident got rid of the expanded cable package he subscribed to. He changed rate plans with his cellular phone carrier, set a monthly food budget and limited his entertainment and miscellaneous spending.

But he was a little short. He did the math again and was still short the second time around.

It was on the third round of calculations that Thompson got an idea. One of the bills that he had coming due was for a term life insurance policy that was up for its annual renewal. Another was the bi-annual payment for insurance on his 2003 Triton 186 boat.

“I looked at it this way, since I was cutting out a lot of my personal spending, I felt deferring the boat and life insurance bills could bring me to the number I needed. I was only going to do it for six months,” Thompson said.

He knew it was risky, but felt the risk was worth it.

“I thought the chance of me dying in the next six months and anything happening to my boat during that stretch was unlikely,” Thompson said. “I know there’s Murphy’s Law, but I felt somewhat safe in my decision.”

It was a safe decision until a stormy night last month when Murphy made a visit to Lawrence County along with a strong spring thunderstorm.

It was about 5 a.m. when Thompson was awoken by the sounds of thunderclaps and then a muffled thud. Stepping out into his yard, the feeling in his gut three months ago, made a return. His boat had a major portion of a 50-year-old tree on it.

The impact was so heavy that it partially bent the trailer the boat was sitting on.

“I knew it. I just knew it,” Thompson said. “I stood there for at least three minutes just saying that over and over.”

Now he sits without a life insurance policy along with a damaged and still uninsured boat. But Thompson is not alone.

Recent statistics show that with money becoming tighter, many individuals across Lawrence County are making that risky choice — deleting or reducing their current insurance coverage.

For people like Thompson, it has lead to costing them more than they originally planned on saving.

A tough decision

Ask any Lawrence County resident and more than likely they are going admit to being a little more frugal in 2009 than they were in 2008.

Besides being stylish, saving money and clipping coupons have become a “must” for many area families trying to ride out the current economic storm.

But while reducing insurance coverage to save money does come with instant cost savings, it also comes with inherent risks. It leaves homes, cars, boats and even individuals underinsured and opens the door to major financial hardship should disaster strike.

In the case of life insurance, it also makes immediate family members vulnerable.

Mike Hurley of the Joe Hurley Insurance Agency of Ironton said his clients are inquiring about ways to save money on their current policies — mostly cars.

“The biggest things we are seeing are people looking to delete or reduce the physical damage portions of policies for cars that are paid for,” Hurley said.

Ohio law requires all drivers to carry liability automobile insurance. If a driver is in accident, liability insurance covers any damages (medical and repairs) the policy holder may have incurred by hitting another person’s vehicle. It also is needed as it protects the insured from being sued.

However, what liability insurance does not pay for is the damage to their own vehicle should they be in an accident and it is their fault. Hurley said many are now determining the value of their cars and the trade-off of having the physical damage coverage on or off their policy.

According to the Insurance Resource Council, an insurance-supported research organization, 28 percent of the policy holders they recently surveyed have shopped for lower insurance rates based on the current state of the economy while 15 percent increased their insurance deductible or reduced coverage.

Nine percent said they cancelled or did not renew insurance on a vehicle they owned.

Five percent of homeowners surveyed said they had canceled or not renewed their homeowners insurance, as did 14 percent of renters.

While many insurance policies can be altered or changed, many are required by law. Besides liability insurance for cars, homeowners are required to carry insurance if under a mortgage.

But according to Hurley, new business on discretionary coverage is where he has seen the economy affect policy holders.

“People are price conscience. Actually, rates have been pretty steady in this economy,” Hurley said.

Hurley added that while it is smart to be conscience about prices, those looking to reduce or delete coverage should consider both the benefits and difficulty doing so could bring.

“Anyone who reduces or deletes their coverage is assuming more risk. In other words, they are self insuring themselves.”

And for Thompson, lessons were learned from self insurance.

“There are times you have to make tough decisions. I got a little unlucky, but once I get back on my feel, getting my policies reactivated will be one of the first things I do,” Thompson. “As for now, the fish get a pass for 2009.”


WOULD YOU LIKE TO SHARE THIS STORY?

Bookmark and Share



Comments

Posted by eugene (anonymous) on July 5, 2009 at 8:53 a.m. (Suggest removal)

sorry but if you can't afford the insurance you can't afford the boat. should have sold the boat.

Posted by Digi (anonymous) on July 5, 2009 at 1:45 p.m. (Suggest removal)

I totally agree, if he cant afford to insure it he should have sold it or not whine about the tree hitting it. Why is this news? Half the people in the county have this problem and instead of cutting out their boat insurance they have had to cut fruits and veggies from their diet to have money for utilities and homes. Don't put a story like this here expecting people to say; awe poor dude lost his boat, cause it's not happening.

Posted by cashmere (anonymous) on July 5, 2009 at 2:14 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Yeah, I guess his gut feeling didn't include selling the boat. We Americans, and include myself, don't easily recognize what we can do without.

Posted by Vil (anonymous) on July 5, 2009 at 7:31 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Um, the home owner's insurance should have covered the tree falling on the boat, unless the boat wasn't on his property. Then it would be covered under the insurance on the property the boat was on.

No matter what, the boat would not have been covered even if it was insured because a tree fell on it outside of the water, so canceling the boat insurance had no bearing in this story.

Insurance is a tricky business and the reporter here should have asked Mr. Hurley or another local agent about how insurance works before printing a feature article on the front page of the Sunday Tribune.

Posted by MasterChef (anonymous) on July 5, 2009 at 8:14 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Vil, I realize the Trib has been without a Managing Editor for some time, but if all these continued negative remarks are intended to show Mr. Caldwell what you can do, I think its safe to say you won't be getting the job.

Posted by Vil (anonymous) on July 5, 2009 at 9:22 p.m. (Suggest removal)

I have no clue what you are talking about. Seriously.

Posted by nottellin (anonymous) on July 6, 2009 at 9:15 a.m. (Suggest removal)

That's ok, Vil, neither does he.

Posted by kce (anonymous) on July 6, 2009 at 10:11 a.m. (Suggest removal)

When i was reading the article, selling the boat was where I thought it was leading. Son you missed the SAFE opportunity here. I think a budget is a must for all families and have lived on one, keeping track of all my monthly expenses for years, even to the point of recording every routine expenditure on a spread sheet so I can in a moments notice compare say my water bill, cable bill, electricity bill, even insurance bills in July 1995 to my current bill in July 2009. I found it very enlightening from time to time to go check these out.

Posted by lindj (anonymous) on July 6, 2009 at 11 a.m. (Suggest removal)

I didn't think the story was intended to garner sympathy for the man who lost his boat. I thought it was that we should learn from this man's mistake and not cut back on things we really should keep. He cut out 2 insurances he thought he could live without for a few months. He lost that gamble. What if he had died without the life insurance. Where would that have left his family. I think that was the point of running the story.

Posted by MasterChef (anonymous) on July 6, 2009 at 12:09 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Vil, my point was (sorry it wasn't in phonetics for you) that in nearly EVERY post you seem to have a negative response, usually a condesending one, designed to stroke your ego.

Nottellin, your posts are equally negative. At least Vil uses complete sentences!

Posted by Vil (anonymous) on July 6, 2009 at 6:46 p.m. (Suggest removal)

If posting useful information and asking the Tribune reporter to get more information for a story so he can be helpful is negative, then call me negative.

Most people call it 'helpful'.

Posted by nottellin (anonymous) on July 6, 2009 at 7:29 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Oh, boohoo.. masterchef doesn't like my posts...
If the city weren't so negative I wouldn't be... but they just beg for it.
Frankly, mc, if you spent HALF as much time commenting on stories as you do bullying people on this forum, you might actually contribute. But, as long as you just try to bully people into silence, you just look like an old grouch with nothing better to do than WHINE about people who don't write what you want to read.
You're as negative as, if not moreso, anyone posting here.

Posted by AllTappedOut2 (anonymous) on July 7, 2009 at 2:01 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Well, I see MC just got it! And yes, I am one of those that felt bullied into not speaking my mind from time to time on here. I did have some good points but got afraid to speak them for fear of being pushed in the mud for it. We need to get along and play nice. Thanks Nottellin!

I think we all got away from the subject here and the meaning of the story. Don't cancel the insurance!!!

Post a comment (Terms of Use Policy)

(Requires free registration.)

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:



advanced search

© 2010 The Ironton Tribune All rights reserved.
A Boone Newspapers Inc. publication.

Contact us | Privacy Policy