Print this story |
E-mail story |
This story has 6 comments Add your own |
iPod friendly | Bookmark this
What is this?
Voters to decide future of jobs program
Published Tuesday, February 9, 2010
On May 4, Ohioans will be asked to decide the future of the Ohio Third Frontier Program, a 10-year, $1.4 billion investment initiated in 2002 by the General Assembly and then-Governor Bob Taft to provide grants to Ohio companies and research institutions to develop high-tech products, stimulate business growth and create jobs.
The program, which is supported by $500 million in bonds approved by Ohio voters in 2005, is set to expire in 2012.
According to recent testimony from the Ohio Department of Development in the Senate Finance & Financial Institutions Committee, the Third Frontier has created more than 40,000 jobs and helped to attract $6.6 billion in investment to Ohio.
For more information on the Third Frontier Program please visit http://thirdfrontier.com.
This past week the Ohio House and Senate reached an agreement on House Joint Resolution 12, a constitutional amendment that will appear on the ballot in May to authorize the state to issue $700 million in bonds to continue the Third Frontier Program for four years.
While HJR 12 passed with strong bipartisan support, negotiations on the proposal were tough and required burning the midnight oil to reach a compromise.
In November last year, House Democrats announced their intention to pursue a $1 billion renewal of the Third Frontier over five years and introduced HJR 12 shortly thereafter. Governor Strickland also voiced his support for the plan.
The Senate maintained that we were proud of the success of the Third Frontier and were committed to its renewal, but before the General Assembly asked voters to allow the state to spend more money on the program, we felt that it was important to craft a plan that was responsible and something Ohio voters could support.
On Jan. 11, the House passed HJR 12 as a $950 million renewal of the Third Frontier.
The Senate followed by approving a $500 million proposal, which mirrored the Third Frontier bond issue that Ohio voters said “yes” to in 2005 and an amount that we saw as a true renewal of the program.
The House did not agree with the Senate’s version of HJR 12, so a conference committee was formed to work out the differences between the two chambers. I served on the committee with State Senator Tom Niehaus (R-New Richmond), State Senator Dale Miller (D-Cleveland), State Representative Jay Goyal (D-Mansfield), State Representative Sandra Williams (D-Cleveland) and State Representative Ron Amstutz (R-Wooster).
The conference committee met late on Tuesday, Feb. 2, and after much deliberation, reached a compromise to put a $700 million Third Frontier package before voters on May 4.
The consensus was that this figure provides the resources necessary to maintain a successful job creation program in which the investment pays for itself over a period of years while at the same time taking into account Ohio’s current budget situation.
It is also important to note (this is coming from the budget geek in me) that these dollars are bonded, which means that they cannot be spent to support ongoing state programs that are currently paid for through the state’s general revenue fund.
The Third Frontier Program has been a great success and is part of Ohio’s long-term strategy to create jobs and attract the development of innovative products and services that will help our state transition to a new economy. Third Frontier funds have been directed over the years to help grow promising small businesses or support research and development efforts at places like the Cleveland Clinic.
The program has also helped bring investment to the 17th Senate District through grants for various businesses.
Ultimately, it will be up to Ohio voters to decide if they think the Third Frontier Program is worth continuing into the next decade, and as your state senator, I am comfortable with giving you that option.
But no matter what happens with the Third Frontier, I will continue to do everything I can to create an environment in Ohio that is inviting to businesses and helps to attract investment and bring jobs to our local communities.
John A. Carey is a member of the Ohio Senate and represents the 17th District. He can be reached at Ohio Senate, Statehouse, Columbus, Ohio 43215 or by phone at (614) 466-8156.
WOULD YOU LIKE TO SHARE THIS STORY?




Comments
Posted by mikehaney (anonymous) on February 9, 2010 at 10:17 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Even though we're in an economic slump, this program is well worth looking at to vote yes for Ohio jobs.
Posted by wonderingoutloud (anonymous) on February 9, 2010 at 12:13 p.m. (Suggest removal)
6.6 billion dollars and 40,000 jobs!!!
How many jobs did it develop in Lawrence County?
How much did this cost Lawrence County?
Vote no, unless you want more of the same.
Posted by jonferguson (anonymous) on February 9, 2010 at 8:48 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Mike,
I'm shocked to hear your approval. You've been firm against the economic stimulus package on a national level. Why the change in heart on the state level?
I must say, I am and have been impressed with Ohio's ability to work in bipartisan form to solve our issues.
Posted by mikehaney (anonymous) on February 9, 2010 at 10:19 p.m. (Suggest removal)
jonferguson
Ohio is in a slump presently. Third Frontier seems like it should continue. I did say it would be "well worth looking at".
It will work if administered above board and for worthy projects that will produce a return.
Also the figure is 950 million over 10 years.
I figure our chances of spending productive stimulus money is "50" times better. Keeps our money closer to home.
Posted by mikehaney (anonymous) on February 9, 2010 at 10:33 p.m. (Suggest removal)
It is tough to vote intelligently but I believe people are realizing they had better or we may really get in trouble in this country.
I will always remember voting my 4th year at college,absentee ballot at OU in Athens. Voted straight Democrat ticket. My parents were Dems.
Now I consider my vote too valuable just to give away.
Keep em coming John Carey, and Jason. May not vote your way but any and all input appreciated.
Posted by jonferguson (anonymous) on February 11, 2010 at 6:08 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Thanks for the input Mike. I am a democrat, but I don't vote straight ticket for candidates OR issues. I vote for what makes sense to me.
I have been at odds with some of Mr. Carey's ideology, but respect him for his beliefs. Also, I think Jason Stephens has done a very good job crossing the invisible middle line, and working to help the people of Lawrence County.
I agree with you that just about anything, short of maybe legalizing prostitution or drugs, that helps build jobs and our economic base REQUIRES us looking into, and investing in smartly.
To me, we're in the place where we have always heard "you've got to spend money to make money."
I know we have waste in several government offices, but it is also the largest employer in the country. If the government can create jobs that allows people to sustain their way of life or improve it, I'm all for it, so long as it isn't to the detriment of someone else's livelihood.
Good posts Mike. Much appreciated.
Post a comment (Terms of Use Policy)
(Requires free registration.)