Phase II of sewer project underway
Phase II of Ironton’s Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System Program began this week.
Environmental Protection Agency-mandated sanitary and storm sewer separation projects are happening in cities across the country. The City of Ironton adopted and implemented a storm water management plan Dec. 22, 2008, and it is ahead of schedule for its 2026 completion date.
“We are in compliance with the EPA’s order,” Ironton Mayor Rich Blankenship, said. “We get fined by the EPA if we fail to meet deadlines so it’s important to stay on schedule. The contract is for nine months, but all signs point toward finishing prior to that.”
Phase II — at a cost of $647,365 — is paid for through the city’s storm water utility fund, which the city residents pay into every month based on the amount of water used. The current phase must be completed by Dec. 31, 2015. The city has received one Ohio Public Works Commission grant of $300,000 for the entire 18-year project.
“We are about a year ahead of schedule,” Patrick Leighty, of city engineering firm E.L. Robinson, said. “The schedule of completion was agreed on at the same time the agreement was made for the court order. Construction for this phase wasn’t scheduled to begin until July 31.”
The North Ironton section was finished last year. With a complete project schedule to follow, the South Ironton/Mastin Avenue section was completed earlier this year. Phase II, from North Fifth and Elm streets to the city’s wastewater treatment plant and northeast toward U.S. 52, has begun.
“It’s a pretty large area land-wise,” Leighty said. “Although it’s the same size as the other areas there’s a lot more pavement and other things to contend with.”
The entire project is set for completion no later than 2026 and after two years of submitting progress reports every six months, in 2028 the city can apply for termination of contract.
The Clean Water Act of 1987 established requirements on local communities to regulate storm water discharges within their municipal jurisdiction. The program requires the city to implement a minimum of six controls: public education and outreach, public participation and involvement, illicit discharge detection and elimination, construction site runoff control, post-construction site runoff control, and pollution prevention and good housekeeping.
City officials were made aware of the separation issue in the late 1990s. Failure to respond resulted in a fine of nearly $100,000 in 2008.
“We paid $48,000 to the state EPA and $48,000 to the federal EPA,” Blankenship said. “We tried to get them to put that money back into the project, but that didn’t happen.”
Unfunded mandates from the EPA are something Blankenship says cause financial hardships.
“They mandate things,” he said, “but they don’t fund them. They give us deadlines and if we miss them, we get fined.
“We have engineers continuously working on our EPA compliance schedule. “The project is divided into sections.”
Rehabilitating manholes is also being performed under the mandate, which entails fixing cement and doing other necessary upgrades to minimize water infiltration.