Archived Story
Taxpayers need info on rec levy
Published 12:00am Sunday, January 13, 2013The old saying is that, “If at first you don’t succeed, try and try again.” That certainly seems to be the case in Lawrence County when it comes to property tax levies.
Ironton officials are moving forward with a plan to place the recreation levy on the November ballot, despite the fact it was voted down last year — although with a margin of just more than 100 votes.
As we said then, and repeat now, the city’s approach to the recreation levy must change or the results will likely — and probably should — stay the same.
First, city leaders must create a better plan to communicate with citizens. Last year virtually nothing was done to educate the public.
Then, they need to clearly define exactly how every dollar of the approximate $65,000 that the levy would generate each year would be spent.
No more generalities and broad statements. How much goes towards the recreation director’s salary? How does he spend his time each season? How much is used simply to pay for cutting the grass at the city’s parks, which are almost unusable in places? How much goes toward youth sports programs that could likely sustain themselves? How many people are actually benefitting from the programs offered? What plans are in place to provide more diverse offerings and improve the city’s parks?
The answers to these questions will go a long way toward helping voters make up their minds and helping city leaders get feedback about what citizens really want.
For many people, the levy is a relatively small expense, but it joins a variety of other fees and services that continue to be placed on citizens.
The right plan and the right communication of it will be vital.
no The fundraisers helps with Shirts and equipment and watever else the kids need to do their activities, it just help with those costs.And I have seen coaches spend their own money or us parents to get what is needed.
Some of these kids would be running the streets if it wasnt for the sports and then everyone would be yelling about that….
(Report comment)
If $65,000 is all this brings in it would barely pay the recreation director’s salary, his insurance (Ironton employees get 100 percent of their insurance paid and 100 percent of their retirement paid by the taxpayers) and the expense of a telephone, computer and paper to print schedules on. It would be easier for the city to just put another $1 on the water bill. That would raise about the same amount of money ($1 x 12 months = $12 x 5,000 water meters = $60,000.
(Report comment)
I agree.
(Report comment)