Archived Story

What’s next for once grand landmark?

Published 12:57am Sunday, February 17, 2013

The 120-year-old Memorial Hall may have been cemented in the National Register of Historic Places, but its fate as a landmark in Ironton is not so certain.
To keep Memorial Hall or not to keep it — that was the topic of discussion at Thursday’s Ironton finance committee meeting.
Since the Lawrence County Commission gave up the possibility of restoring the site last fall, the responsibly of the structure’s future fell back at the feet of the City of Ironton, which owns the site on a corner lot at Fourth and Railroad streets.
Mayor Rich Blankenship presented the committee with some quotes from the city’s contracted engineering firm, E.L. Robinson Engineering, on the cost to begin removing the interior of Memorial Hall and stabilizing the walls.
The cost to clear out the interior, removing the wood, plaster and other debris, would cost about $100,000.
Patrick Leighty, the engineering firm’s Ironton office manager, said the debris would have to be removed with a crane.
Another approximate $56,000 for steel framework would add to the cost, Leighty said, to support the exterior brick walls.
“Those walls are 50 feet tall on the inside,” Leighty said. “And with the building codes, since they are so tall, you have to brace up the brick on the inside. … Once we removed all the debris there is nothing there to support the brick from bowing in.”
“That’s not anywhere near a finished product?” committee member Kevin Waldo asked Leighty.
“No, nowhere close,” Leighty said. “Absolutely not. There is lots of work.”
Waldo also asked Leighty if the structure had suffered any additional deterioration since he last inspected the building in 2011.
“It has caved in more,” Leighty said. “Whenever we did that (inspection) originally, there were still a couple of trusses that were up. There are no trusses and more things have fallen down into the basement.”
“If you look inside of it now, about half of it is down,” Blankenship said. “When we took the roof off, we did put steel beams up. So they are still there.”
The current state of Memorial Hall sparked a debate on how to proceed with the structure. Committee members agreed that restoration was not an option due to finances, but even the $156,000 project to gut the interior left the committee wondering where that money would come from.
“What is the cost just to look at the other end?” committee member Aaron Bollinger asked. “What’s the cost for full demolition?”
Leighty said demolition could cost between $250,000 and $300,000, but also said other companies may be interested in the historic stone of the structure.
“There are a lot of companies that would really be envious of that stone,” Leighty said. “You don’t know how hard they would sharpen their pencils, but I would say there are some New York companies, New England companies, there are people who would come a pretty far way.”
Bollinger said he was in favor of researching if there were companies that would bid on the demolition job for a chance at the stonework.
“We could really minimize the demolition cost because of bidding this out to those who want these products,” Bollinger said.
Committee member Mike Lutz reminded the group that Shawn Walker, of Ashland-based Walker and Associates, had drawn up plans to demolish the structure but leave the stone and create a green space and veterans memorial.
“I think we need to tear it down, but I liked Shawn Walker’s proposal if it is feasible,” Lutz later said. “I don’t think the building is salvageable to any kind of use.”
Lutz also said he was in favor of selling some of the stone if that meant cutting the cost of demolition.
“I think, procedurally, we need to establish this is our goal. This is what we want to accomplish,” Waldo said. “It seems like every time we talk about Memorial Hall, we start going on off all these tangents and worrying about things and we lose sight of the eventual goal, to get that place, one, safe. I think everyday, there is a chance of it coming down.
“… If we can’t get the money, let’s figure out a way to get that property to somebody that can do something with it. Five and a half years now I’ve been on council and that building has been down there, literally, falling apart.”
Waldo said council needs to decide, as a group, if Memorial Hall should be torn down completely, restored or partially kept for a park and then put bids out.
“I agree with what you’re saying Kevin. We don’t want to get off on a tangent,” Bollinger said. “I think it could become a simpler question of, we make this decision. Do we want to keep it, or do we want to look into demolishing it. I think that’s the answer. Keep it or not keep it.”
Blankenship said he would research the options and have the information to present to the finance committee next month.
“I don’t want to leave this office and that building still be like that,” he said.


The Tribune believes it is possible for people with a variety of points of view to discuss issues in a civil manner and will remove comments that, in our opinion, foster incivility. We want to encourage an open exchange of information and ideas. Responsibility for what is posted or contributed to this site is the sole responsibility of each user. By contributing to this website, you agree not to post any defamatory, abusive, harassing, obscene, sexual, threatening or illegal material, or any other material that infringes on the ability of others to enjoy this site, or that infringes on the rights of others. Any user who feels that a contribution to this website is a violation of these terms of use is encouraged to email, or click the "report comment" link that is on all comments. We reserve the right to remove messages that violate these terms of use and we will make every effort to do so — within a reasonable time frame — if we determine that removal is necessary.

  • TribuneSubscriber

    Way back about 3 years ago I attended 2 different public meetings concerning Memorial Hall.

    There was a ‘lot of yacky talk’ and tears shed.
    But there was a man there who was asked by Mayor Blankenship and at a council meeting if he would draw or sketch his ideas and proposal for a community park.

    I know that the mayor took and hopefully kept those drawings of a nice looking and relatively inexpensive memorial park.

    In one picture he drew a memorial wall with the stone plaques in the tower and a larger granit stone with old memorial hall imposed on it.

    there were 3 or 4 flags behind this and there were 2 large community shelters and trees and a walkway all around the park and he talked of a large evergreen tree for the city’s living christmas tree.

    It was also suggested that this would be the starting point for all parades and get togethers in Ironton in the future.

    The Mayor and Council need to re-look into these pictures and i say GO FOR IT..!! a Memorial Hall Park..!!

    (Report comment)

  • mickakers

    It is difficult to comprehend that the citizens of Ironton and Lawrence County would allow Memorial Hall to deteriorate in this manner. This demonstrates a lack of cultural appreciation and responsibility. With this mental attitude, it is no wonder that Ironton is a dying town.

    (Report comment)

    • swampcreature

      I agree Mick. A city that does not know or value its own history has no future.

      Memorial Hall is by far the most historical structure in Ironton. President Taft spoke there in May of 1912. Teddy Roosevelt spoke there from the back staircase. DTI tracks made it an easy campaign stop.

      This is not simply a former city building. This building housed an organization called the GAR. GAR (Grand Army of the Republic)was a highly active group after winning the Civil War. This building is a monument to their service and sacrifice during our bloodiest war. Many men from Ironton helped preserve the union and ultimately decided the issue of slavery.

      Our officials are at this point with the building because they failed to put a roof on the structure when it needed it. They roofed the Depot in hopes a restaurant would prosper there when others had already failed at the location. City found $200,000 to roof the Ro-Na which was in worse shape than Memorial Hall when the city acquired it.

      Don’t get me wrong; I think the Ro-Na and Depot are structures worthy of preserving. I just see it as ironic how our officials simply view Memorial Hall as an old city building when its history far outshines all other structures.

      (Report comment)

  • 1 Concerned Citizen

    Get rid of this place once and for all. There is no sense in wasting any more tax payer money on this dump. Even if it was restored it would not compare with a new structure that would cost much less to build.
    Also, there is no way that the demolition of this building would cost no where near what was quoted here. I have been a contractor for over 20 years and these figures are way off. I guess because it would be a goverment approved project they have to add 50% extra for their friends pocket.

    (Report comment)

Editor's Picks