Archived Story

CCC levy missing from first half bills

Published 12:01am Sunday, April 14, 2013

Just because it wasn’t on their tax bills doesn’t mean Lawrence County taxpayers can get out of paying their part of the Collins Career Center improvement levy.

Property owners will just have to double up on the second half bills that are due in July.

Last month the Lawrence County Auditor’s Office discovered that the one-half mill levy had not been placed on the tax duplicate for the first half of property taxes that had been sent out in January and due March 8.

The levy is to bring in approximately $400,000 over five years to the school district to fund a $22 million major overhaul of the facility. It was passed in March 2012. In December when Deputy Auditor Chris Kline was getting the tax rates together he did not have a letter of certification from the county board of elections about the levy.

After an election when a levy has passed, the county board of elections is to send a letter of certification to the auditor’s office and the department of taxation. That letter states that a particular levy has passed and what the vote tally was.

“We found (the error) when I was working on the joint vocational school budget for next year,” Kline said. “(The school’s) treasurer had a line item for permanent improvement property levy anticipating revenue and I don’t have a levy and that triggered it.”

Kline then called the state taxation department to see if it had a copy of the certification.

“When they received my rates, they should have compared them to the levy results from the board of elections,” Kline said. “If they had received (the results), they should have caught it as well.”

Now the state board of taxation has ordered that the entire amount of the levy be placed on the second half tax bills due in July. Those who paid the entire year of taxes in March will receive an additional bill.

“They think they are paid in full but they aren’t,” County Treasurer Stephen Burcham said. “It will be sent as part of the second half tax bill. People who thought they paid their entire tax bill will have another bill coming out.”

The half-mill tax on a property with a value of $100,000 will cost a taxpayer $15.31 for the year. That should have been split, with $7.66 on the first half and $7.65 on the second half.

“My job is to collect taxes that are assessed by the auditor,” Burcham said. “That information is provided. If we do not have the rates provided that is also the responsibility of the auditor to provide them prior to the submission to the printing company. They are supposed to review all of this. If this (situation) causes an undue hardship, I will be glad to work with (taxpayers) on a case by case basis.”

County Prosecutor Brigham Anderson said just because there was an error in the billing doesn’t eliminate the fact that the tax levy exists.

“The mere fact that it was not placed on the tax bill doesn’t relieve the taxpayer of the burden to pay the tax,” Anderson said. “This is a situation where the voters voted to approve a tax levy. It is in effect and is required to be paid. (Not being on the tax bills) doesn’t relieve the tax liability.”

The auditor’s office has guaranteed that the joint vocational school will get its money and has worked with its computer software company to take the amount the district should have gotten in March from the first half collections. That money will be paid back from the second half collections.

“It is unfortunate but we found the error and all the taxing entities will be whole at end of the day,” County Auditor Jason Stephens said. “We didn’t have a record. The tax department didn’t have record. The board of elections said they mailed it. You have to make it right. We will move forward and put in place measures that it will not happen again.”

Now when a certification from the elections board is received by the auditor’s office, both a representative from the board and the auditor’s office will sign it.

Cathy Overbeck, director of the elections board, was unavailable for comment Friday.

Board member Mark McCown said it was his understanding from Overbeck that she had notified the auditor’s office and the taxation department.

“(She) sent those out in a timely fashion,” McCown said. “She pulled the certification and verified with her internal records that those were properly sent out.”

The Tribune believes it is possible for people with a variety of points of view to discuss issues in a civil manner and will remove comments that, in our opinion, foster incivility. We want to encourage an open exchange of information and ideas. Responsibility for what is posted or contributed to this site is the sole responsibility of each user. By contributing to this website, you agree not to post any defamatory, abusive, harassing, obscene, sexual, threatening or illegal material, or any other material that infringes on the ability of others to enjoy this site, or that infringes on the rights of others. Any user who feels that a contribution to this website is a violation of these terms of use is encouraged to email report-comments@irontontribune.com, or click the "report comment" link that is on all comments. We reserve the right to remove messages that violate these terms of use and we will make every effort to do so — within a reasonable time frame — if we determine that removal is necessary.

  • Cashmere

    A couple of observations: Aren’t Stephens and Burcham politicians who would most likely notice there was an election and results?
    And, instead of walking out to the mailbox in front of the court house, how about walking up one floor from the board of elections to the auditor’s office and hand the levy certification to the auditor, who could walk it over to the treasurer? This, “it’s in the mail” and “it’s not my fault” sounds like a sitcom. It reminds of when the county kept paying for a fired election board member and the excuse was, we just do what the commission tells us. The court house is not that big, this is not a huge urban complex. Communicate.

    (Report comment)

  • Jackyl

    What I wuld like to know is why all of us taxpayers vote these levies in when we know it will cost us more money , Let the lottery pay for remodeling, new schools , and all the other crap they try to pass on us .

    (Report comment)

  • m

    Isn’t it funny that the Election Board and Ms Ovrbeck are never to blame for any mistakes ? Did they not make a mistake before and this same levy was delayed being voted on ? If neither the State or the Auditor’s office received the info,the election Board IS at fault.C’mon guys far too many errors are made in that office and someday it won’t be as easy to fix as chargeing the taxpayers more money.

    (Report comment)

  • concerned taxpayer

    My guess is they had the info, to much good ol boy back door deals going on in the auditors office to do their jobs, their to buisy loaning tax payer money to the comissioners who are late on bills at 1 % or 2% instead of 18%-23.7% like the tax payer who is having it rough too!! I paid my first half in full,I will not pay ccc but half at a time, add it on 6 months late at the end just like you want now,(SLACKERS) or see me in court!!!

    (Report comment)

  • Digi

    You would think something that important would have had to be signed for. Incompetence is running rampant these days. It doesn’t matter who was at fault there should be a better checks and balance system in place for things of this nature, get it in gear folks! People don’t like the feeling of getting screwed over! Especially considering how high taxes are already and how overestimated the value of properties are today.

    (Report comment)

  • swampcreature

    Our family was among the 12 percent that paid property taxes in FULL for the year. While I don’t believe this is a legally collectible debt for the current tax year, our family will nevertheless pay the debt caused by utterly incompetent courthouse personnel.

    We shall NEVER again do the county a favor and pay the property taxes for the full year. The county will never again get our money early in order to pad its cash budget or to collect interest at the bank.

    (Report comment)

    • hdm1903

      This story was in the herald dispatch 2 weeks ago!
      Whats up with that?
      The passage of that levy was suspicious I think.
      Got to love the absentee ballet in Lawrence county!

      (Report comment)

Editor's Picks